TY - JOUR
T1 - The mandarin version of the consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice (Cape-V) and its reliability
AU - Chen, Zhen
AU - Fang, Rui
AU - Zhang, Yi
AU - Ge, Pingjiang
AU - Zhuang, Peiyun
AU - Chou, Adriana
AU - Jiang, Jack
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this study is to develop the Mandarin version of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) and evaluate its reliability compared with the Grade, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, Strain (GRBAS). Method: The Mandarin version of the CAPE-V tool was translated from the validated English version with phonemic adaptations, content adjustment, and scale modification. Sixty dysphonic, 20 normal, and 20 repeated voice samples were included in this study. Ten of these were used for preassessment training; the remaining 90 were evaluated using the Mandarin CAPE-V and GRBAS for comparison of their interrater and intrarater reliabilities. Results: Intrarater reliability was measured by Pearson r for the CAPE-V and Spearman rho for the GRBAS. Average CAPE-V Pearson r ranged from 0.80 for strain to 0.91 for overall severity, compared with average GRBAS Spearman rho of 0.83 for strain to 0.89 for asthenia. Interrater reliability was measured by an intraclass coefficient (ICC). Average CAPE-V ICCs ranged from.57 for pitch to.81 for overall severity, compared with average GRBAS ICCs of.60 for asthenia to.83 for grade. Conclusions: The Mandarin CAPE-V addresses some limits of the English version. It also demonstrates good intrarater and interrater reliability, comparable to those of GRBAS.
AB - Purpose: The purpose of this study is to develop the Mandarin version of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) and evaluate its reliability compared with the Grade, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, Strain (GRBAS). Method: The Mandarin version of the CAPE-V tool was translated from the validated English version with phonemic adaptations, content adjustment, and scale modification. Sixty dysphonic, 20 normal, and 20 repeated voice samples were included in this study. Ten of these were used for preassessment training; the remaining 90 were evaluated using the Mandarin CAPE-V and GRBAS for comparison of their interrater and intrarater reliabilities. Results: Intrarater reliability was measured by Pearson r for the CAPE-V and Spearman rho for the GRBAS. Average CAPE-V Pearson r ranged from 0.80 for strain to 0.91 for overall severity, compared with average GRBAS Spearman rho of 0.83 for strain to 0.89 for asthenia. Interrater reliability was measured by an intraclass coefficient (ICC). Average CAPE-V ICCs ranged from.57 for pitch to.81 for overall severity, compared with average GRBAS ICCs of.60 for asthenia to.83 for grade. Conclusions: The Mandarin CAPE-V addresses some limits of the English version. It also demonstrates good intrarater and interrater reliability, comparable to those of GRBAS.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85055613030
U2 - 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-S-17-0386
DO - 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-S-17-0386
M3 - 文章
C2 - 30242389
AN - SCOPUS:85055613030
SN - 1092-4388
VL - 61
SP - 2451
EP - 2457
JO - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
JF - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
IS - 10
ER -