跳到主要导航 跳到搜索 跳到主要内容

Student progression on chemical symbol representation abilities at different grade levels (Grades 10-12) across gender

  • East China Normal University

科研成果: 期刊稿件文章同行评审

摘要

Chemical symbol representation is used extensively in chemistry classrooms; however, due to its abstract nature, many students struggle with learning and effectively utilizing these symbolic representations, which can lead to ongoing failure in subsequent chemistry learning. Taking the perspective of learning progressions, this study identifies how students' abilities in chemical symbol representation progress at different grade levels (Grade 10-12), across the genders. A sample of 713 students - 254 tenth graders, 262 eleventh graders and 197 twelfth graders - was selected from three senior secondary schools located in Jiangsu, China. A measurement instrument developed in a former study was used to measure students' chemical symbol representation abilities and students' raw scores were converted into Rasch scale scores, allowing for direct comparisons of students of different grades. The results of chi-squared tests and analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicated that chemical symbol representation abilities are affected by statistically significant gender and grade effects. Students from higher grades performed better than students from lower grades, and generally, male students obtained a higher mean score than did their female peers. The findings also revealed that there was a statistically significant interaction effect between gender and grade. While male students started out with a much higher mean score in Grade 10, by Grade 11 there was not much of a difference between male and female students' mean scores, and female students' mean score was higher than male students' mean score by Grade 12.

源语言英语
页(从-至)1055-1064
页数10
期刊Chemistry Education Research and Practice
19
4
DOI
出版状态已出版 - 2018

学术指纹

探究 'Student progression on chemical symbol representation abilities at different grade levels (Grades 10-12) across gender' 的科研主题。它们共同构成独一无二的学术指纹。

引用此