跳到主要导航 跳到搜索 跳到主要内容

Risk assessment of estuaries under climate change: Lessons from Western Europe

  • Jaak Monbaliu*
  • , Zhongyuan Chen
  • , Didier Felts
  • , Jianzhong Ge
  • , Francois Hissel
  • , Jens Kappenberg
  • , Siddharth Narayan
  • , Robert J. Nicholls
  • , Nino Ohle
  • , Dagmar Schuster
  • , Janina Sothmann
  • , Patrick Willems
  • *此作品的通讯作者
  • KU Leuven
  • East China Normal University
  • CETMEF (Institute for maritime and inland waterways)
  • Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon
  • University of Southampton
  • Hamburg Port Authority

科研成果: 期刊稿件文章同行评审

摘要

Climate change with rising sea levels and possible changes in surge levels and wave climate will have a large impact on how we protect our coastal areas and cities. Here the focus is on estuarine locations not only affected by tide and surge propagation, but also potentially influenced by freshwater discharge. Mitigation measures might be diverse ranging from pure hard 'engineering' solutions all the way to significant realignment. The variation in the type/origin and extent of the flood sources greatly influences subsequent risk management measures. At the same time, society is increasingly demanding that we take a holistic view on risk management, embracing and balancing safety, ecological and socio-economic aspects. This requires that all these diverse factors need to be considered together and integrated. In this context, the Source-Pathway-Receptor (SPR) approach offers a powerful holistic tool to investigate changing risk connected to extreme events.The traditional SPR approach with a consecutive treatment of the flood, pathway and receptor is well understood and is widely used in coastal flood risk analysis. Here an enhanced 2D conceptual version of the SPR method is used to better describe the system and to allow flexibility in considering multiple scales, flood sources and pathways. The new approach is demonstrated by three estuarine case studies in western Europe: the Gironde estuary, France; the Dendermonde region in the Scheldt estuary, Belgium; and HafenCity (Hamburg) in the Elbe estuary, Germany. They differ considerably in the surface area considered, in the type of flood sources, and hence also in the SPR configuration. After a brief introduction of the typical characteristics of the three study sites including some lessons learned from past flood protection measures, the differences in application and results of the SPR approach are discussed. Emphasis is on the specific aspects for each study site, but embedded in a generic SPR framework. The resulting generic lessons learned about the flood sources and how this shapes subsequent analysis are transferable to numerous important estuaries worldwide. copy; 2014 Elsevier B.V.

源语言英语
页(从-至)32-49
页数18
期刊Coastal Engineering
87
DOI
出版状态已出版 - 5月 2014

联合国可持续发展目标

此成果有助于实现下列可持续发展目标:

  1. 可持续发展目标 13 - 气候行动
    可持续发展目标 13 气候行动

指纹

探究 'Risk assessment of estuaries under climate change: Lessons from Western Europe' 的科研主题。它们共同构成独一无二的指纹。

引用此