摘要
This study compares the experiences of Shanghai in China and Los Angeles in the United States to illustrate four tension points in pandemic responses: immediacy versus thoroughness, transparency versus secrecy and security, centralization versus decentralization, and state-driven solutions versus coproduction. Based on the case analysis, strategic management and planning practices in six stages of pandemic response are recommended. The study also suggests research questions for future comparative research to examine more carefully how pandemic responses should vary due to institutional differences and local contextualization and adaptation.
| 源语言 | 英语 |
|---|---|
| 页(从-至) | 497-504 |
| 页数 | 8 |
| 期刊 | American Review of Public Administration |
| 卷 | 50 |
| 期 | 6-7 |
| DOI | |
| 出版状态 | 已出版 - 1 8月 2020 |
学术指纹
探究 'Responding to the Coronavirus Pandemic: A Tale of Two Cities' 的科研主题。它们共同构成独一无二的学术指纹。引用此
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver