摘要
Lin recently claimed that the privacy-preserving aggregation authentication scheme (PPAAS) based on a certificateless aggregation signcryption scheme (CASS) proposed in our paper (IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, vol.17, pp.317-331, Jan.2022) suffers from a forgery attack from type II adversary. In this paper, we show that this attack is not valid since the adversary outputs a trivial forged ciphertext. Specifically, the adversary has the master secret key and randomly selects the secret values of all users.
| 源语言 | 英语 |
|---|---|
| 页(从-至) | 10373-10374 |
| 页数 | 2 |
| 期刊 | IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security |
| 卷 | 19 |
| DOI | |
| 出版状态 | 已出版 - 2024 |
指纹
探究 'Rebuttal to "on the Unforgeability of 'Privacy-Preserving Aggregation-Authentication Scheme for Safety Warning System in Fog-Cloud Based VANET"'' 的科研主题。它们共同构成独一无二的指纹。引用此
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver