Corrigendum: Breaking the Linear Relation in the Dissociation of Nitrogen on Iron Surfaces

Figure 1 in the original manuscript (see Figure 1 in this corrigendum) should be replaced by the corrected version shown in Figure 2 below, where the energy curve in panel b has been moved to a position consistent with the values given in the original figure. 1 Figure (Figure presented.) Figure 1 in the original paper (D. Liu, W. Zhao, Q. Yuan, ChemPhysChem 2022, 23, e202200147). 2 Figure (Figure presented.) Recreation of Figure 1 in the original paper (see Figure 1), where the energy curve in panel b has been moved to a position consistent with the values given in the original figure. In the introduction part of page 1, reference 8 should be cited as a “thermocatalytic” experimental work. Therefore, the sentence “Up to now, a variety of methods including thermocatalytic,^[3–5] electrocatalytic,^[6–8] photocatalytic,^[9,10] chemical looping^[11] processes have been developed to synthesize ammonia.” (in the first paragraph of the introduction) should be corrected to “Up to now, a variety of methods including thermocatalytic,^[3–5,8] electrocatalytic,^[6,7] photocatalytic,^[9,10] chemical looping^[11] processes have been developed to synthesize ammonia.” On page 2 (at the top of the right column) “…and (Figure presented.) / (Figure presented.) is the energy of (Figure presented.) in a vacuum.” should be corrected to “…and (Figure presented.) is the energy of (Figure presented.) in a vacuum, and (Figure presented.) is the energy of the Fe substrate.” On page 4 of the manuscript, the sentence “The corresponding reaction energies on Fe (110) are −2.90, 0.45, 1.09, 0.72, and 0.58 eV, respectively.” should be corrected to “The corresponding reaction energies on Fe (110) are −3.00, 0.45, 1.09, 0.72, and 0.58 eV, respectively.” The authors apologize for these oversights.