跳到主要导航 跳到搜索 跳到主要内容

Complexity analysis of distinguishing attack on 51-step RIPEMD-160

  • East China Normal University

科研成果: 期刊稿件文章同行评审

摘要

SASAKI Y, et al used message modification technology to differentiate attack on 51-step RIPEMD-160(Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 7341), but they did not consider the influence of modular subtraction difference on differential routes, and could not guarantee that the probability of the validation of the first half of the left and right operations is 1, which led to the error in the complexity of RIPEMD-160. For this reason, RIPEMD-160 differentiator is constructed by 2-dimension sums method and an improved distinguishing attack complexity analysis method is proposed. Sufficient conditions are given to ensure the validation of modular subtraction difference in differential routes. The probability of the validation of the first half of differential routes of left and right operations is increased from 2-7. 717 to 1 after message modification. The probability of the validation of differential routes of the second half is obtained through experimental tests. The analysis results show that the complexity of distinguishing attacks on 51-step RIPEMD-160 is 2152. 672.

源语言英语
页(从-至)147-152
页数6
期刊Jisuanji Gongcheng/Computer Engineering
45
9
DOI
出版状态已出版 - 9月 2019

指纹

探究 'Complexity analysis of distinguishing attack on 51-step RIPEMD-160' 的科研主题。它们共同构成独一无二的指纹。

引用此