跳到主要导航 跳到搜索 跳到主要内容

Comparison of alternative remediation technologies for recycled gravel contaminated with heavy metals

  • Xiaofeng Gao
  • , Yilu Gu
  • , Sheng Huang
  • , Guangyin Zhen
  • , Guannan Deng
  • , Tian Xie
  • , Youcai Zhao*
  • *此作品的通讯作者
  • Tongji University
  • CAS - Institute of Hydrobiology
  • National Institute for Environmental Studies of Japan

科研成果: 期刊稿件文章同行评审

摘要

To evaluate the effects of different remediation methods on heavy metals contaminated recycled gravel, three immobilization agents (monopotassium phosphate, lime, nano-iron) and two mobilization agents (glyphosate, humic acid (HA)) were studied and compared. Results indicated that nano-iron powder was found to be more effective to immobilize Zn, Cu, Pb and Cd. Meanwhile, glyphosate presents a higher mobilization effect than HA with removal rates of about 66.7% for Cd, more than 80% for Cr, Cu and Zn, and the highest removal percentage of 85.9% for Cr. After the mobilization by glyphosate, the leaching rates of Zn, Cu and Cr were about 0.8%, and below 0.2% for Pb and Cd. The leaching rates after nano-iron powder treatment were 1.18% for Zn, 0.96% for Cr, 0.61% for Cu, 0.45% for Pb and Cd not detected. The formation and disappearance of metal (Zn/Cu/Cr/Pb/Cd) compounds were firmly confirmed through X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy analyses on crystalline phases and morphological surface structures.

源语言英语
页(从-至)1005-1014
页数10
期刊Waste Management and Research
33
11
DOI
出版状态已出版 - 1 11月 2015
已对外发布

学术指纹

探究 'Comparison of alternative remediation technologies for recycled gravel contaminated with heavy metals' 的科研主题。它们共同构成独一无二的学术指纹。

引用此