摘要
In geostatistics some methods work under the strong hypothesis of multiGaussianity. Sequential Gaussian simulation and multiGaussian kriging are examples of these methods that require original data transformed into normal score. However, it does not guarantee that cumulative distributions functions for two, three or more points follow a Gaussian distribution as well. All available tests so far have used two-point statistics that is best described by a semivariogram function. If the test for two points is positive then the multiGaussian model can be adopted. In this paper two methods are tested with three samples drawn from an exhaustive data set. Results of these methods are compared each other and in conclusion one of them can be considered statistically robust.
| 投稿的翻译标题 | Comparison of methods for bigaussianity tests |
|---|---|
| 源语言 | 葡萄牙语(巴西) |
| 页(从-至) | 121-128 |
| 页数 | 8 |
| 期刊 | Geociencias |
| 卷 | 28 |
| 期 | 2 |
| 出版状态 | 已出版 - 2009 |
| 已对外发布 | 是 |
关键词
- Normal score transform
- Variograms of indicator variables
- Variograms of order ω
- biGaussianity
学术指纹
探究 'Comparação de métodos para teste de bigaussianidade' 的科研主题。它们共同构成独一无二的学术指纹。引用此
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver