When reality bites: Hopeful thinking mediates the discrimination-life satisfaction relationship

Airong Zhang, Lijuan Cui, Aarti Iyer, Jolanda Jetten, Zhen Hao

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

We examine the role of hopeful thinking in enhancing life satisfaction among a minority group facing pervasive group-based discrimination: country migrant workers' children in China. Positive psychology reasoning suggests that hopeful thinking can attenuate the negative impact of perceived discrimination on life satisfaction. This moderation model is compared to a mediation model, which predicts that reduced hopeful thinking explains the negative impact of perceived discrimination on life satisfaction. Study 1 showed that hopeful thinking did not moderate the relationship between discrimination and life satisfaction. Rather, the negative impact of discrimination on life satisfaction was mediated through diminished hopeful thinking. Study 2 manipulated perceived discrimination and replicated Study 1 findings. The results reveal that hopeful thinking can indeed have positive consequences, but that hopeful thinking is also constrained by perceiving discrimination. This suggests that there are limits to the extent to which hopeful thinking can be developed when facing group-based discrimination.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)379-393
Number of pages15
JournalAnalyses of Social Issues and Public Policy
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Dec 2014

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'When reality bites: Hopeful thinking mediates the discrimination-life satisfaction relationship'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this