TY - JOUR
T1 - Using logic model and visualization to conduct portfolio evaluation
AU - Wu, Huang
AU - Shen, Jianping
AU - Jones, Jeffrey
AU - Gao, Xingyuan
AU - Zheng, Yunzheng
AU - Krenn, Huilan Y.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2019/6
Y1 - 2019/6
N2 - Portfolio evaluation is the evaluation of multiple projects with a common purpose. While logic models have been used in many ways to support evaluation, and data visualization has been used widely to present and communicate evaluation findings, adopting logic models for portfolio evaluation and using data visualization to share findings simultaneously is surprisingly limited in the literature. With the data from a sample portfolio of 209 projects which aims to improve the system of early care and education (ECE), this study illustrated how to use logic model and data visualization techniques to conduct a portfolio evaluation by answering two evaluation questions: “To what extent are the elements of a logic model (strategies, sub-strategies, activities, outcomes, and impacts) reflected in the sample portfolio?” and “Which dominant paths through the logic model were illuminated by the data visualization technique?” For the first question, the visualization technique illuminated several dominant strategies, sub-strategies, activities, and outcomes. For the second question, our visualization techniques made it convenient to identify critical paths through the logic model. Implications for both program evaluation and program planning were discussed.
AB - Portfolio evaluation is the evaluation of multiple projects with a common purpose. While logic models have been used in many ways to support evaluation, and data visualization has been used widely to present and communicate evaluation findings, adopting logic models for portfolio evaluation and using data visualization to share findings simultaneously is surprisingly limited in the literature. With the data from a sample portfolio of 209 projects which aims to improve the system of early care and education (ECE), this study illustrated how to use logic model and data visualization techniques to conduct a portfolio evaluation by answering two evaluation questions: “To what extent are the elements of a logic model (strategies, sub-strategies, activities, outcomes, and impacts) reflected in the sample portfolio?” and “Which dominant paths through the logic model were illuminated by the data visualization technique?” For the first question, the visualization technique illuminated several dominant strategies, sub-strategies, activities, and outcomes. For the second question, our visualization techniques made it convenient to identify critical paths through the logic model. Implications for both program evaluation and program planning were discussed.
KW - Data visualization
KW - Logic model
KW - Portfolio evaluation
KW - Program evaluation and planning
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85062438560
U2 - 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2019.02.011
DO - 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2019.02.011
M3 - 文章
C2 - 30861395
AN - SCOPUS:85062438560
SN - 0149-7189
VL - 74
SP - 69
EP - 75
JO - Evaluation and Program Planning
JF - Evaluation and Program Planning
ER -