Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Trust and power as determinants of tax compliance across 44 nations

  • Larissa Batrancea*
  • , Anca Nichita
  • , Jerome Olsen
  • , Christoph Kogler
  • , Erich Kirchler
  • , Erik Hoelzl
  • , Avi Weiss
  • , Benno Torgler
  • , Jonas Fooken
  • , Joanne Fuller
  • , Markus Schaffner
  • , Sheheryar Banuri
  • , Medhat Hassanein
  • , Gloria Alarcón-García
  • , Ceyhan Aldemir
  • , Oana Apostol
  • , Diana Bank Weinberg
  • , Ioan Batrancea
  • , Alexis Belianin
  • , Felipe de Jesús Bello Gómez
  • Marie Briguglio, Valerij Dermol, Elaine Doyle, Rebone Gcabo, Binglin Gong, Sara Ennya, Anthony Essel-Anderson, Jane Frecknall-Hughes, Ali Hasanain, Yoichi Hizen, Odilo Huber, Georgia Kaplanoglou, Janusz Kudła, Jérémy E. Lemoine, Supanika Leurcharusmee, Thorolfur Matthiasson, Sanjeev Mehta, Sejin Min, George Naufal, Mervi Niskanen, Katarina Nordblom, Engin Bağış Öztürk, Luis Pacheco, József Pántya, Vassilis Rapanos, Christine Roland-Lévy, Ana Maria Roux-Cesar, Aidin Salamzadeh, Lucia Savadori, Vidar Schei, Manoj Sharma, Barbara Summers, Komsan Suriya, Quoc Tran, Clara Villegas-Palacio, Martine Visser, Chun Xia, Sunghwan Yi, Sarunas Zukauskas
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Babes-Bolyai University
  • 1 Decembrie 1918 University of Alba Iulia
  • University of Vienna
  • Tilburg University
  • University of Cologne
  • Bar-Ilan University
  • Taub Center for Social Policy Studies in Israel
  • IZA Institute of Labor Economics
  • Queensland University of Technology
  • Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA)
  • University of Queensland
  • Eliiza
  • University of East Anglia
  • American University in Cairo
  • University of Murcia
  • Dokuz Eylul University
  • University of Turku
  • Berlin School of Economics and Law
  • Higher School of Economics
  • Russian Academy of Sciences
  • Universidad de las Americas Puebla
  • University of Malta
  • International School for Social and Business Studies
  • University of Limerick
  • University of Pretoria
  • Ibn Zohr University
  • Ashesi University
  • University of Nottingham
  • Lahore University of Management Sciences
  • Kochi University of Technology
  • University of Fribourg
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
  • University of Warsaw
  • University of East London
  • ESCP Business School
  • Chiang Mai University
  • University of Iceland
  • Faculty of Social Sciences
  • Dongguk University
  • Texas A&M University
  • University of Eastern Finland
  • University of Gothenburg
  • Uppsala University
  • Portucalense University
  • Eotvos Lorand University
  • University of Debrecen
  • Academy of Athens
  • Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne
  • Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie
  • University of Tehran
  • University of Trento
  • Norwegian School of Economics
  • National Institute of Technology Hamirpur
  • University of Leeds
  • Bridgewater State University
  • Universidad Nacional de Colombia
  • University of Cape Town
  • The University of Hong Kong
  • Noah Holdings Limited
  • University of Guelph
  • Mykolas Romeris University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The slippery slope framework of tax compliance emphasizes the importance of trust in authorities as a substantial determinant of tax compliance alongside traditional enforcement tools like audits and fines. Using data from an experimental scenario study in 44 nations from five continents (N = 14,509), we find that trust in authorities and power of authorities, as defined in the slippery slope framework, increase tax compliance intentions and mitigate intended tax evasion across societies that differ in economic, sociodemographic, political, and cultural backgrounds. We also show that trust and power foster compliance through different channels: trusted authorities (those perceived as benevolent and enhancing the common good) register the highest voluntary compliance, while powerful authorities (those perceived as effectively controlling evasion) register the highest enforced compliance. In contrast to some previous studies, the results suggest that trust and power are not fully complementary, as indicated by a negative interaction effect. Despite some between-country variations, trust and power are identified as important determinants of tax compliance across all nations. These findings have clear implications for authorities across the globe that need to choose best practices for tax collection.

Original languageEnglish
Article number102191
JournalJournal of Economic Psychology
Volume74
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2019

Keywords

  • 2960
  • Power
  • Slippery slope framework
  • Tax compliance
  • Tax evasion
  • Trust

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Trust and power as determinants of tax compliance across 44 nations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this