Transformation: From (Trans-)Gender Roles to Profiles

Hans Georg Moeller, Paul J. D’Ambrosio, Aglaja Stirn, Jorge Ponseti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Combining a philosophical approach with empirical psychology, this essay investigates the relationship between “profilicity,” the formation of identity in orientation to profiles, and gender identity. We discuss empirical research that indicates a significant difference between transgender identity in traditional (collectivist) and modern (individualist) societies. We suggest that this difference is due to a shift in the formation of gender identity away from gender roles and toward gender profiles. To substantiate this claim, we first outline a basic theoretical terminology of identity and gender. Then, we critically analyze the representation of gender, including transgender, in contemporary popular culture. Finally—with a descriptive, but not therapeutic intention—we discuss several case studies of identity formation of transgender people. We conclude that theoretical problems arising from historical shifts in gender identity formation, including transgender identity formation, are best conceptualized in terms of profilicity rather than in the still prevailing semantics of authenticity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)278-295
Number of pages18
JournalLinacre Quarterly
Volume91
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2024

Keywords

  • authenticity
  • gender
  • gender dysphoria
  • gender identity
  • gender incongruence
  • gender roles
  • identity
  • profilicity
  • transgender
  • transsexualism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Transformation: From (Trans-)Gender Roles to Profiles'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this