Toward more realistic projections of soil carbon dynamics by Earth system models

  • Yiqi Luo*
  • , Anders Ahlström
  • , Steven D. Allison
  • , Niels H. Batjes
  • , Victor Brovkin
  • , Nuno Carvalhais
  • , Adrian Chappell
  • , Philippe Ciais
  • , Eric A. Davidson
  • , Adien Finzi
  • , Katerina Georgiou
  • , Bertrand Guenet
  • , Oleksandra Hararuk
  • , Jennifer W. Harden
  • , Yujie He
  • , Francesca Hopkins
  • , Lifen Jiang
  • , Charlie Koven
  • , Robert B. Jackson
  • , Chris D. Jones
  • Mark J. Lara, Junyi Liang, A. David McGuire, William Parton, Changhui Peng, James T. Randerson, Alejandro Salazar, Carlos A. Sierra, Matthew J. Smith, Hanqin Tian, Katherine E.O. Todd-Brown, Margaret Torn, Kees Jan Van Groenigen, Ying Ping Wang, Tristram O. West, Yaxing Wei, William R. Wieder, Jianyang Xia, Xia Xu, Xiaofeng Xu, Tao Zhou
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

395 Scopus citations

Abstract

Soil carbon (C) is a critical component of Earth system models (ESMs), and its diverse representations are a major source of the large spread across models in the terrestrial C sink from the third to fifth assessment reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Improving soil C projections is of a high priority for Earth system modeling in the future IPCC and other assessments. To achieve this goal, we suggest that (1) model structures should reflect real-world processes, (2) parameters should be calibrated to match model outputs with observations, and (3) external forcing variables should accurately prescribe the environmental conditions that soils experience. First, most soil C cycle models simulate C input from litter production and C release through decomposition. The latter process has traditionally been represented by first-order decay functions, regulated primarily by temperature, moisture, litter quality, and soil texture. While this formulation well captures macroscopic soil organic C (SOC) dynamics, better understanding is needed of their underlying mechanisms as related to microbial processes, depth-dependent environmental controls, and other processes that strongly affect soil C dynamics. Second, incomplete use of observations in model parameterization is a major cause of bias in soil C projections from ESMs. Optimal parameter calibration with both pool- and flux-based data sets through data assimilation is among the highest priorities for near-term research to reduce biases among ESMs. Third, external variables are represented inconsistently among ESMs, leading to differences in modeled soil C dynamics. We recommend the implementation of traceability analyses to identify how external variables and model parameterizations influence SOC dynamics in different ESMs. Overall, projections of the terrestrial C sink can be substantially improved when reliable data sets are available to select the most representative model structure, constrain parameters, and prescribe forcing fields.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)40-56
Number of pages17
JournalGlobal Biogeochemical Cycles
Volume30
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2016

Keywords

  • CMIP5
  • Earth system models
  • realistic projections
  • recommendations
  • soil carbon dynamics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Toward more realistic projections of soil carbon dynamics by Earth system models'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this