TY - JOUR
T1 - The Vulnerability of the Global Arms Trade
T2 - A Network Perspective
AU - Guo, Weidong
AU - Du, Debin
AU - Li, Tingzhu
AU - Zhang, Qiang
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2025.
PY - 2025/9
Y1 - 2025/9
N2 - This study employs a combination of complex network analysis and computer simulation to investigate the vulnerability of global arms trade networks and dependence of arms-importing countries on the major global arms exporters. The results indicate the following: (1) The global arms trade network is robust, with the United States, Russia, and Western Europe nations dominating arms exports and forming three core communities centered around the United States, Russia, and France. (2) The global arms trade network exhibits a hierarchical structure, with the US serving as the unequivocal dominant. Hierarchical networks led by the United States and Russia demonstrate significant structural fragility. Russia’s military allies are more reliant on Russian arms supply compared to the military allies of the United States. (3) The global arms trade network possesses robustness against random attacks but vulnerability to targeted attacks. The stabilizing effect on the network structure is pronounced for the top 6 countries in terms of degree centrality but tends toward collapse after 37.3% of the nodes are attacked.
AB - This study employs a combination of complex network analysis and computer simulation to investigate the vulnerability of global arms trade networks and dependence of arms-importing countries on the major global arms exporters. The results indicate the following: (1) The global arms trade network is robust, with the United States, Russia, and Western Europe nations dominating arms exports and forming three core communities centered around the United States, Russia, and France. (2) The global arms trade network exhibits a hierarchical structure, with the US serving as the unequivocal dominant. Hierarchical networks led by the United States and Russia demonstrate significant structural fragility. Russia’s military allies are more reliant on Russian arms supply compared to the military allies of the United States. (3) The global arms trade network possesses robustness against random attacks but vulnerability to targeted attacks. The stabilizing effect on the network structure is pronounced for the top 6 countries in terms of degree centrality but tends toward collapse after 37.3% of the nodes are attacked.
KW - Arms Trade Network
KW - Dominant flow
KW - Sensitivity Interdependence Model
KW - Simulated Attacks
KW - Social Network Analysis
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85217168356
U2 - 10.1007/s11067-025-09665-3
DO - 10.1007/s11067-025-09665-3
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:85217168356
SN - 1566-113X
VL - 25
SP - 593
EP - 612
JO - Networks and Spatial Economics
JF - Networks and Spatial Economics
IS - 3
ER -