TY - JOUR
T1 - The strength of adult community education as a professional field in aid-receiving countries
T2 - A global mixed-methods study
AU - Wojcicki, Mary A.
AU - Perkins, Douglas D.
AU - Deng, Ningxi
AU - Zhang, Yong
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s)
PY - 2025/1
Y1 - 2025/1
N2 - Community education is a form of organized adult learning focused on locally shared social, economic, and environmental goals with a long history in many countries around the world. This mixed-methods study proposes and tests a model to identify factors influencing the global development of professional training and research in community education, particularly in low-and-moderate-income, foreign aid-receiving countries. A quantitative analysis of 66 countries finds per-capita aid is unrelated to strength of professional community education, but nonviolent grassroots activism, income inequality, and government fiscal decentralization were significant predictors when controlling for civil liberties, GDP per capita, and educational infrastructure. Interviews with community education researchers and practitioners in two aid-receiving (India, South Africa) and, for comparison, two non-aid-receiving countries (China, United States) were qualitatively analyzed. Key informants in India and South Africa diverged regarding the role of the government in their respective contexts and the strength of community education professional training, research, and support in their country. Informants’ perspectives were more aligned in China and the U.S. These observations suggest national or local community education policies and funding could help rich, poor, and especially highly unequal countries develop stronger professional training and programs.
AB - Community education is a form of organized adult learning focused on locally shared social, economic, and environmental goals with a long history in many countries around the world. This mixed-methods study proposes and tests a model to identify factors influencing the global development of professional training and research in community education, particularly in low-and-moderate-income, foreign aid-receiving countries. A quantitative analysis of 66 countries finds per-capita aid is unrelated to strength of professional community education, but nonviolent grassroots activism, income inequality, and government fiscal decentralization were significant predictors when controlling for civil liberties, GDP per capita, and educational infrastructure. Interviews with community education researchers and practitioners in two aid-receiving (India, South Africa) and, for comparison, two non-aid-receiving countries (China, United States) were qualitatively analyzed. Key informants in India and South Africa diverged regarding the role of the government in their respective contexts and the strength of community education professional training, research, and support in their country. Informants’ perspectives were more aligned in China and the U.S. These observations suggest national or local community education policies and funding could help rich, poor, and especially highly unequal countries develop stronger professional training and programs.
KW - Civil liberties
KW - Community education
KW - Fiscal decentralization
KW - Grassroots activism
KW - Income
KW - Popular education
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105002865138
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijer.2025.102609
DO - 10.1016/j.ijer.2025.102609
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:105002865138
SN - 0883-0355
VL - 131
JO - International Journal of Educational Research
JF - International Journal of Educational Research
M1 - 102609
ER -