The role of thinking styles in career decision-making self-efficacy among university students

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

40 Scopus citations

Abstract

Intellectual style refers to people's preferred ways of processing information and dealing with tasks. A major controversial issue in the field of styles is whether or not styles are value-laden. Anchored in Sternberg (1997) theory of thinking styles (one model of intellectual styles), this study addressed this issue by examining the role of thinking styles in career decision-making self-efficacy. Nine hundred and twenty-six university students responded to a questionnaire consisting of the Thinking Style Inventory-Revised II, the Career Decision-making Self-efficacy Scale-Short Form, and a demographic sheet. Results indicated that creativity-generating (Type I) thinking styles played a positive role in students' career decision-making self-efficacy. Furthermore, no significant relationship was found between norm-conforming (Type II) thinking styles and career decision-making self-efficacy. The findings contribute to the discussion of the issue over style value and have implications for facilitating students' career maturity in higher education.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)63-73
Number of pages11
JournalThinking Skills and Creativity
Volume20
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jun 2016

Keywords

  • Career decision-making self-efficacy
  • Thinking styles

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The role of thinking styles in career decision-making self-efficacy among university students'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this