Abstract
The rise to supremacy and decline of big powers are all subject to the laws of geopolitics. Geographers should keep up with the pace of the times, and accurately get an overall understanding of the interests of the state to seize the opportunity to contribute to the great rejuvenation of Chinese nation. However, the lack of criticism for history and philosophy of geopolitics will make it unable to understand the practice of geopolitical theory accurately and effectively. Therefore, this paper introduces the development of the critical geopolitics, which summarizes three characteristics of critical geopolitics so as to explain the four classical geopolitical theories. In order to simplify the explanation and interpretation, this paper first proposes an analytical framework of four classical geopolitical theories. Secondly, we explain "The Geographical Pivot of History" put forward by Mackinder as a focal point. Lastly, we draw a conclusion on the four classic critical geopolitical theories. The conclusion made through the critical interpretation is that the classical theory of geopolitics is not only scientific, but also hypothetic and idealistic to some extent. The construction of the classical geopolitical theory is established based on international geopolitical structure, spatial distribution of the interests of the state and space conflicts between countries, which shows the identity of theoretical constructionist, and reflects the historical, social and situational sides of the geopolitical theory and geography-power structure.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 851-863 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Dili Xuebao/Acta Geographica Sinica |
| Volume | 70 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Jun 2015 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Critical geopolitics
- Edge district theory
- Geopolitics
- Land power theory
- National organism theory
- Sea power theory