Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The effects of non-self-sustained oscillators on the en-trainment ability of the suprachiasmatic nucleus

  • Changgui Gu*
  • , Ming Tang
  • , Jos H.T. Rohling
  • , Huijie Yang
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Shanghai for Science and Technology
  • University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
  • Leiden University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In mammals, the circadian rhythms of behavioral and physiological activities are regulated by an endogenous clock located in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). The SCN is composed of ∼20,000 neurons, of which some are capable of self-sustained oscillations, while the others do not oscillate in a self-sustainable manner, but show arrhythmic patterns or damped oscillations. Thus far, the effects of these non-self-sustained oscillatory neurons are not fully explored. Here, we examined how the proportion of the non-self-sustained oscillators affects the free running period under constant darkness and the ability to entrain to the light-dark cycle. We find that the proportion does not affect the free running period, but plays a significant role in the range of entrainment. We also find that its effect on the entrainment range depends on the region where the non-self-sustained oscillators are located. If the non-self-sustained oscillatory neurons are situated in the light-sensitive subregion, the entrainment range narrows when the proportion increases. If they are situated in the light-insensitive subregion, however, the entrainment range broadens with the increase of the proportion. We suggest that the heterogeneity within the light-sensitive and light-insensitive subregions of the SCN has important consequences for how the clock works.

Original languageEnglish
Article number37661
JournalScientific Reports
Volume6
DOIs
StatePublished - 21 Nov 2016

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The effects of non-self-sustained oscillators on the en-trainment ability of the suprachiasmatic nucleus'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this