TY - JOUR
T1 - Technology-Assisted Vocabulary Learning for EFL Learners
T2 - A Meta-Analysis
AU - Hao, Tao
AU - Wang, Zhe
AU - Ardasheva, Yuliya
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - This meta-analysis reviewed research between 2012 and 2018 focused on technology-assisted second language (L2) vocabulary learning for English as a foreign language (EFL) learner. A total of 45 studies of 2,374 preschool-to-college EFL students contributed effect sizes to this meta-analysis. Compared with traditional instructional methods, the overall effect of technology-assisted L2 vocabulary learning was large (g =.845), suggesting that technology-assisted L2 vocabulary learning was more beneficial than non-technology-assisted instruction. Importantly, within-study comparison results indicated that technology could enhance learners’ long-term vocabulary retention. Moderator analysis results highlight several variables—namely, device type, game condition, setting, test format, and reported reliability—affecting the effectiveness of vocabulary learning. Specifically, advantages were found for mobile devices and on-the-move learning, suggesting that L2 vocabulary learning may be most efficient when students use mobile phones and are not restricted by classroom settings. These variables should be considered when planning instruction in technology-assisted L2 vocabulary learning.
AB - This meta-analysis reviewed research between 2012 and 2018 focused on technology-assisted second language (L2) vocabulary learning for English as a foreign language (EFL) learner. A total of 45 studies of 2,374 preschool-to-college EFL students contributed effect sizes to this meta-analysis. Compared with traditional instructional methods, the overall effect of technology-assisted L2 vocabulary learning was large (g =.845), suggesting that technology-assisted L2 vocabulary learning was more beneficial than non-technology-assisted instruction. Importantly, within-study comparison results indicated that technology could enhance learners’ long-term vocabulary retention. Moderator analysis results highlight several variables—namely, device type, game condition, setting, test format, and reported reliability—affecting the effectiveness of vocabulary learning. Specifically, advantages were found for mobile devices and on-the-move learning, suggesting that L2 vocabulary learning may be most efficient when students use mobile phones and are not restricted by classroom settings. These variables should be considered when planning instruction in technology-assisted L2 vocabulary learning.
KW - EFL
KW - Technology
KW - language education
KW - meta-analysis
KW - vocabulary
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85107866681
U2 - 10.1080/19345747.2021.1917028
DO - 10.1080/19345747.2021.1917028
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:85107866681
SN - 1934-5747
VL - 14
SP - 645
EP - 667
JO - Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness
JF - Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness
IS - 3
ER -