Teaching (Chinese/non-western) philosophy as philosophy: The humble gatekeeper

In this paper we argue that the approach for teaching non-Western, and specifically Chinese philosophy to undergraduate Western students, does not have to be significantly different than that for teaching philosophies from "Western"traditions. Four areas will be explored. Firstly, we look at debates on teaching non-Western philosophy from the perspective of themes or traditions, suggesting that, as an overarching guideline, it is mote discussion. Secondly, in terms of making generalizations, we argue that no more explanation of the "Chineseness"of Chinese philosophy be offered than the "Germanness"of German philosophy, or "Greekness"of Greek philosophy. Thirdly, that lines of philosophical coherences are not limited to regional or cultural bounds. Finally, that foreign language be used in a way that invites understanding and does not close ideas off to students. In sum, we suggest applying well proven methods of teaching "Western"philosophy to Chinese (and other "Non-Western") philosophies. After all, value of Chinese and other "Non-Western"philosophies comes not from their being "Chinese"or "Non-Western,"but from being philosophical.