Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Symbolic representation of rural christianity and the inventiveness of faith traditions

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

There are two dominant perceptions on the relationship between Christianity and rural society and culture in China, one is more concerned about the authenticity of Christianity from the church's perspective, while the other talks about "cultural security" from the view of the local tradition of China. These seemingly contradictory views are in fact based on the same historical model known as impact-response. It is a well developed model in that it could explain the "mission church" (church in China), while it seems less and less likely to help us grasp the nature and reality of the "local church" (China Church). Hence this article is dealing with the following questions, taking Huanan church as an example: Is it plausible for us to consider this kind of local church and its believers as a sort of Christian faith tradition de facto? In light of the assumption, how should we understand the diversified symbolic representations and even inventions? Further, how should we understand the continuity and discontinuity of tradition, if we consider the faith tradition as a cultural tradition?

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)211-228
Number of pages18
JournalLogos and Pneuma - Chinese Journal of Theology
Issue number42
StatePublished - 1 Mar 2015

Keywords

  • Faith/cultural tradition
  • Inventiveness of tradition
  • Rural christianity
  • Symbolic invention

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Symbolic representation of rural christianity and the inventiveness of faith traditions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this