TY - JOUR
T1 - Sulfidation methods determine longevity and performance of zerovalent iron
T2 - Mechanistic insights into trichloroethylene removal and aging resistance
AU - Wang, Xiaoxuan
AU - Liu, Yabo
AU - Zhang, Zhenmin
AU - Qin, Hejie
AU - Guan, Xiaohong
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2026/1/1
Y1 - 2026/1/1
N2 - Although sulfidation has been widely applied to enhance the removal performance of trichloroethylene (TCE) by nanoscale zerovalent iron (nZVI), the comparative effects of sulfidation methods, especially their long-term efficacy, remain unclear due to incomparable conditions in literature. Here, three sulfidated nZVI (S-nZVI) prepared using typical sulfidation methods (solid-solid (SS), aqueous-aqueous (AA), and aqueous-solid (AS)) were compared for TCE removal in terms of kobs, electron efficiency (EE), and performance evolution during aging. S-nZVI(SS) exhibited the highest initial kobs and EE, attributed to its abundant, crystalline FeSx layer that facilitates electron transfer. It also maintained the best long-time performance despite a rapid decline in reactivity due to structural instability of the non-uniform FeSx phase. In contrast, the AA method generated uniform FeSx shells with improved long-term stability but moderate initial performance, whereas the AS method produced thin, less crystalline FeSx layers with the lowest but most stable kobs. Correlation analyses revealed that Fe0 content, electrochemical impedance, and surface Fe2+/S2− were the key physicochemical properties that collectively control the Fe0-FeSx-TCE electron transfer pathway. The crystallinity, coverage, and quantity of the FeSx layer determine the its stability and Fe0 protection, leading to distinct aging resistances across sulfidation methods. These findings not only highlight the SS method as the current optimal sulfidation strategy for balancing short- and long-term performance but also demonstrate the key considerations for developing new sulfidation strategies to enhance aging resistance and address the trade-off between kobs and EE.
AB - Although sulfidation has been widely applied to enhance the removal performance of trichloroethylene (TCE) by nanoscale zerovalent iron (nZVI), the comparative effects of sulfidation methods, especially their long-term efficacy, remain unclear due to incomparable conditions in literature. Here, three sulfidated nZVI (S-nZVI) prepared using typical sulfidation methods (solid-solid (SS), aqueous-aqueous (AA), and aqueous-solid (AS)) were compared for TCE removal in terms of kobs, electron efficiency (EE), and performance evolution during aging. S-nZVI(SS) exhibited the highest initial kobs and EE, attributed to its abundant, crystalline FeSx layer that facilitates electron transfer. It also maintained the best long-time performance despite a rapid decline in reactivity due to structural instability of the non-uniform FeSx phase. In contrast, the AA method generated uniform FeSx shells with improved long-term stability but moderate initial performance, whereas the AS method produced thin, less crystalline FeSx layers with the lowest but most stable kobs. Correlation analyses revealed that Fe0 content, electrochemical impedance, and surface Fe2+/S2− were the key physicochemical properties that collectively control the Fe0-FeSx-TCE electron transfer pathway. The crystallinity, coverage, and quantity of the FeSx layer determine the its stability and Fe0 protection, leading to distinct aging resistances across sulfidation methods. These findings not only highlight the SS method as the current optimal sulfidation strategy for balancing short- and long-term performance but also demonstrate the key considerations for developing new sulfidation strategies to enhance aging resistance and address the trade-off between kobs and EE.
KW - Aging
KW - Multiple linear regression analysis
KW - Reactivity
KW - Selectivity
KW - TCE
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105016495202
U2 - 10.1016/j.watres.2025.124602
DO - 10.1016/j.watres.2025.124602
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:105016495202
SN - 0043-1354
VL - 288
JO - Water Research
JF - Water Research
M1 - 124602
ER -