Spatiotemporal evolution of urban–rural ozone disparities and the “pollution transfer” effect in rapidly urbanizing regions

  • Rui Zhang
  • , Shuyi Zhang
  • , Hanxin Tang
  • , Ke Zeng
  • , Yue Wang
  • , Jiarui Zhang
  • , Mengyao Ci
  • , Ziwen Jin
  • , Min Liu*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Rapid urbanization has intensified surface ozone (O3) pollution, posing a serious threat to public health. This study investigated the spatiotemporal evolution of urban–rural O3 disparities in the Yangtze River Delta (YRD), an emblematic urbanizing region in China, by integrating ground-based observations (2015–2023) with China High Air Pollutants (CHAP) data. Using Sen's slope, the Mann-Kendall test, and random forest modeling, we identified a 24.7 % increase in annual O3 concentrations from 89 μg/m3 in 2015 to 111 μg/m3 in 2023, with dual peaks in May and September. Average O3 levels in urban core, suburban, and rural area were 103.50 μg/m3, 104.63 μg/m3, and 99.67 μg/m3, respectively. The Nanjing-Wuhu-Maanshan's, characterized by dense heavy industry, emerged as a prominent pollution hotspot, exhibiting an average annual growth rate of 3.67 μg/m3/yr. Urban–rural disparities revealed the largest relative O3 increase in rural areas (92.05 %), exceeding those in urban cores (87.57 %) and suburbs (85.89 %). MDA8 O3 variations were best explained at rural scales. Meteorological factors dominated O3 formation in urban cores and suburbs, contributing 37.52 %–39.24 %, while industrial plants density (IPD) was identified as a key factor influencing O3 generation. In megacities, PM2.5 and NO2 were the primary emission contributors of ozone concentration changes, with contributions of 18.68 % and 23.22 %, respectively. Changes in industrial emissions of NO2 and VOCs in urban and rural areas indicated that under rapid urbanization, O3 pollution exhibited pronounced urban-rural differences, with pollution shifting from urban cores toward suburban and rural areas. Industrial spillover and precursor emission migration jointly shaped the spatial distribution of O3, providing a scientific basis for understanding pollution transfer mechanisms and formulating differentiated governance strategies.

Original languageEnglish
Article number102636
JournalUrban Climate
Volume64
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2025

Keywords

  • Industrial migration
  • Influencing factors
  • O
  • The Yangtze River Delta
  • Urban-rural difference

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Spatiotemporal evolution of urban–rural ozone disparities and the “pollution transfer” effect in rapidly urbanizing regions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this