TY - JOUR
T1 - Sparse multivariate function recovery with a small number of evaluations
AU - Kaltofen, Erich L.
AU - Yang, Zhengfeng
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Elsevier Ltd.
PY - 2016/7/1
Y1 - 2016/7/1
N2 - In Kaltofen and Yang (2014) we give an algorithm based algebraic error-correcting decoding for multivariate sparse rational function interpolation from evaluations that can be numerically inaccurate and where several evaluations can have severe errors ("outliers"). Our 2014 algorithm can interpolate a sparse multivariate rational function from evaluations where the error rate 1/. q is quite high, say q=5.For the algorithm with exact arithmetic and exact values at non-erroneous points, one avoids quadratic oversampling by using random evaluation points. Here we give the full probabilistic analysis for this fact, thus providing the missing proof to Theorem 2.1 in Section 2 of our ISSAC 2014 paper. Our argumentation already applies to our original 2007 sparse rational function interpolation algorithm (Kaltofen et al., 2007), where we have experimentally observed that for T unknown non-zero coefficients in a sparse candidate ansatz one only needs T+O(1) evaluations rather than O(T2) (cf. Candès and Tao sparse sensing), the latter of which we have proved in 2007. Here we prove that T+O(1) evaluations at random points indeed suffice.
AB - In Kaltofen and Yang (2014) we give an algorithm based algebraic error-correcting decoding for multivariate sparse rational function interpolation from evaluations that can be numerically inaccurate and where several evaluations can have severe errors ("outliers"). Our 2014 algorithm can interpolate a sparse multivariate rational function from evaluations where the error rate 1/. q is quite high, say q=5.For the algorithm with exact arithmetic and exact values at non-erroneous points, one avoids quadratic oversampling by using random evaluation points. Here we give the full probabilistic analysis for this fact, thus providing the missing proof to Theorem 2.1 in Section 2 of our ISSAC 2014 paper. Our argumentation already applies to our original 2007 sparse rational function interpolation algorithm (Kaltofen et al., 2007), where we have experimentally observed that for T unknown non-zero coefficients in a sparse candidate ansatz one only needs T+O(1) evaluations rather than O(T2) (cf. Candès and Tao sparse sensing), the latter of which we have proved in 2007. Here we prove that T+O(1) evaluations at random points indeed suffice.
KW - Cauchy interpolation
KW - Error correcting coding
KW - Fault tolerance
KW - Multivariate rational function model
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84958744171
U2 - 10.1016/j.jsc.2015.11.015
DO - 10.1016/j.jsc.2015.11.015
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:84958744171
SN - 0747-7171
VL - 75
SP - 209
EP - 218
JO - Journal of Symbolic Computation
JF - Journal of Symbolic Computation
ER -