TY - JOUR
T1 - Sludge decay kinetics and metagenomic analysis uncover discrepant metabolic mechanisms in two different sludge in situ reduction systems
AU - Shao, Yanjun
AU - Zhou, Zhen
AU - Zuo, Yi
AU - Jiang, Jie
AU - Wang, Lihua
AU - Sun, Yiyue
AU - He, Junli
AU - Qiu, Ji
AU - An, Ying
AU - Jiang, Lu Man
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2022/12/10
Y1 - 2022/12/10
N2 - A comparative study was conducted between an anaerobic side-stream reactor (ASSR) process and a sludge process reduction (SPR) activated sludge (SPRAS) process for uncovering crucial metabolic mechanisms governing sludge reduction. Both of two processes were efficient in removing pollutants, while the SPRAS (62.3 %) obtained much higher sludge reduction than the ASSR (27.9 %). The highest rate coefficients of sludge decay, heterotroph lysis and particles hydrolysis were 0.106, 0.219 and 0.054 d−1 in the SPR module, followed by ASSR with coefficients of 0.060, 0.135 and 0.047 d−1. The SPR module achieved an 81.9 % higher sludge decay mass with a 32.8 % smaller volume than the ASSR module. The SPR module preferentially enriched hydrolytic/fermentative and slow-growing bacteria. Metagenomic analysis revealed that SPR strengthened the key hydrolases and L-lactate dehydrogenase in the glycolysis pathways and weakened the citrate cycle, inducing metabolic uncoupling due to the reduced biosynthesis of ATP. Inserting ASSR only altered the ATP biosynthesis pathway, but maintenance metabolism was dominant for sludge reduction, with a long sludge retention time prolonging the food chain for predation.
AB - A comparative study was conducted between an anaerobic side-stream reactor (ASSR) process and a sludge process reduction (SPR) activated sludge (SPRAS) process for uncovering crucial metabolic mechanisms governing sludge reduction. Both of two processes were efficient in removing pollutants, while the SPRAS (62.3 %) obtained much higher sludge reduction than the ASSR (27.9 %). The highest rate coefficients of sludge decay, heterotroph lysis and particles hydrolysis were 0.106, 0.219 and 0.054 d−1 in the SPR module, followed by ASSR with coefficients of 0.060, 0.135 and 0.047 d−1. The SPR module achieved an 81.9 % higher sludge decay mass with a 32.8 % smaller volume than the ASSR module. The SPR module preferentially enriched hydrolytic/fermentative and slow-growing bacteria. Metagenomic analysis revealed that SPR strengthened the key hydrolases and L-lactate dehydrogenase in the glycolysis pathways and weakened the citrate cycle, inducing metabolic uncoupling due to the reduced biosynthesis of ATP. Inserting ASSR only altered the ATP biosynthesis pathway, but maintenance metabolism was dominant for sludge reduction, with a long sludge retention time prolonging the food chain for predation.
KW - Anaerobic side-stream reactor (ASSR)
KW - Metagenome
KW - Microbial community
KW - Sludge in situ reduction
KW - Sludge process reduction activated sludge process (SPRAS)
KW - Wastewater treatment
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85137036396
U2 - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158346
DO - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158346
M3 - 文章
C2 - 36041603
AN - SCOPUS:85137036396
SN - 0048-9697
VL - 851
JO - Science of the Total Environment
JF - Science of the Total Environment
M1 - 158346
ER -