Sludge decay kinetics and metagenomic analysis uncover discrepant metabolic mechanisms in two different sludge in situ reduction systems

Yanjun Shao, Zhen Zhou*, Yi Zuo, Jie Jiang, Lihua Wang, Yiyue Sun, Junli He, Ji Qiu, Ying An, Lu Man Jiang

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

A comparative study was conducted between an anaerobic side-stream reactor (ASSR) process and a sludge process reduction (SPR) activated sludge (SPRAS) process for uncovering crucial metabolic mechanisms governing sludge reduction. Both of two processes were efficient in removing pollutants, while the SPRAS (62.3 %) obtained much higher sludge reduction than the ASSR (27.9 %). The highest rate coefficients of sludge decay, heterotroph lysis and particles hydrolysis were 0.106, 0.219 and 0.054 d−1 in the SPR module, followed by ASSR with coefficients of 0.060, 0.135 and 0.047 d−1. The SPR module achieved an 81.9 % higher sludge decay mass with a 32.8 % smaller volume than the ASSR module. The SPR module preferentially enriched hydrolytic/fermentative and slow-growing bacteria. Metagenomic analysis revealed that SPR strengthened the key hydrolases and L-lactate dehydrogenase in the glycolysis pathways and weakened the citrate cycle, inducing metabolic uncoupling due to the reduced biosynthesis of ATP. Inserting ASSR only altered the ATP biosynthesis pathway, but maintenance metabolism was dominant for sludge reduction, with a long sludge retention time prolonging the food chain for predation.

Original languageEnglish
Article number158346
JournalScience of the Total Environment
Volume851
DOIs
StatePublished - 10 Dec 2022
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Anaerobic side-stream reactor (ASSR)
  • Metagenome
  • Microbial community
  • Sludge in situ reduction
  • Sludge process reduction activated sludge process (SPRAS)
  • Wastewater treatment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sludge decay kinetics and metagenomic analysis uncover discrepant metabolic mechanisms in two different sludge in situ reduction systems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this