Second nature and modern art: On lukacs' response to hegel's "end of art

  • Lu Kaihua*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

To comprehend Hegel's argument that "Art is a thing of the past", one needs to learn Hegel's basic judgment of modern society which is derived from his concept of "second nature". Young Lukacs, however, in light of Hegel, gives his own negative version of "second nature" and his judgment of the relation Ix-tween the modem world and modern art in respect of lyric poetry and novel. Therefore, it is the interaction between the concept of second nature and the concept of modern art that helps us to make sense of why Lukacs took a course against Hegel, though he had absorbed dialectics and philosophy art from Hegel.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)127-135
Number of pages9
JournalTheoretical Studies in Literature and Art
Volume41
Issue number1
StatePublished - 25 Jan 2020
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Lukacsi second nature
  • Modem art
  • Novel
  • The thevry oj the nm

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Second nature and modern art: On lukacs' response to hegel's "end of art'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this