TY - JOUR
T1 - School bullying and self-efficacy in adolescence
T2 - A meta-analysis
AU - Liu, Yanxi
AU - Yu, Xiaohong
AU - An, Fusen
AU - Wang, Yiji
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Foundation for Professionals in Services to Adolescents.
PY - 2023/12
Y1 - 2023/12
N2 - Introduction: Given that literature has examined the relation between school bullying and self-efficacy, findings have been mixed. This meta-analysis aimed to clarify whether school bullying is associated with adolescents' self-efficacy, a key component of social information processing essential for the evaluation of potential behavioral responses. We further examined moderators associated with heterogeneity in the above relation, including participant roles, types of school bullying, types of self-efficacy, and demographic factors (e.g., age, gender, and cultural background). Method: This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Statement for searching, identifying, and screening eligible articles. A total of 53 articles (N = 71,661; Mage = 12.69 years) were included (50 in English and 3 in Chinese). Articles were coded by two graduate-level coders independently with a high inter-rater reliability (97.12%). Results: The results showed that (1) school bullying was negatively associated with self-efficacy (r = −.07, p <.001) among adolescents, and (2) the above relation varied by participant role (e.g., bullies, victims, bully-victims, and defenders), types of school bullying (e.g., traditional bullying, cyberbullying, and both), and types of self-efficacy (e.g., general and domain-specific self-efficacy). Findings: The findings highlight that school bullying is associated with disruptive cognitive processing in adolescence, low self-efficacy in particular, and the heterogeneity should be considered to fully understand the association between school bullying and self-efficacy among adolescents.
AB - Introduction: Given that literature has examined the relation between school bullying and self-efficacy, findings have been mixed. This meta-analysis aimed to clarify whether school bullying is associated with adolescents' self-efficacy, a key component of social information processing essential for the evaluation of potential behavioral responses. We further examined moderators associated with heterogeneity in the above relation, including participant roles, types of school bullying, types of self-efficacy, and demographic factors (e.g., age, gender, and cultural background). Method: This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Statement for searching, identifying, and screening eligible articles. A total of 53 articles (N = 71,661; Mage = 12.69 years) were included (50 in English and 3 in Chinese). Articles were coded by two graduate-level coders independently with a high inter-rater reliability (97.12%). Results: The results showed that (1) school bullying was negatively associated with self-efficacy (r = −.07, p <.001) among adolescents, and (2) the above relation varied by participant role (e.g., bullies, victims, bully-victims, and defenders), types of school bullying (e.g., traditional bullying, cyberbullying, and both), and types of self-efficacy (e.g., general and domain-specific self-efficacy). Findings: The findings highlight that school bullying is associated with disruptive cognitive processing in adolescence, low self-efficacy in particular, and the heterogeneity should be considered to fully understand the association between school bullying and self-efficacy among adolescents.
KW - adolescence
KW - meta-analysis
KW - school bullying
KW - self-efficacy
KW - victimization
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85170552825
U2 - 10.1002/jad.12245
DO - 10.1002/jad.12245
M3 - 文献综述
C2 - 37690104
AN - SCOPUS:85170552825
SN - 0140-1971
VL - 95
SP - 1541
EP - 1552
JO - Journal of Adolescence
JF - Journal of Adolescence
IS - 8
ER -