Responding to the Coronavirus Pandemic: A Tale of Two Cities

  • Shi Hong Weng
  • , Anna Ya Ni
  • , Alfred Tat Kei Ho*
  • , Ruo Xi Zhong
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

25 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study compares the experiences of Shanghai in China and Los Angeles in the United States to illustrate four tension points in pandemic responses: immediacy versus thoroughness, transparency versus secrecy and security, centralization versus decentralization, and state-driven solutions versus coproduction. Based on the case analysis, strategic management and planning practices in six stages of pandemic response are recommended. The study also suggests research questions for future comparative research to examine more carefully how pandemic responses should vary due to institutional differences and local contextualization and adaptation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)497-504
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Review of Public Administration
Volume50
Issue number6-7
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Aug 2020

Keywords

  • COVID-19
  • comparative public management
  • emergency management
  • pandemic response
  • public governance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Responding to the Coronavirus Pandemic: A Tale of Two Cities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this