Removal of arsenate from water by coagulation with in situ formed versus pre-formed Fe(III)

Yuankui Sun, Xinmei Xiong, Gongming Zhou, Chaoyang Li, Xiaohong Guan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

27 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this study the performance of Fe(III) formed in situ, generated by oxidizing Fe(II) with H2O2 or KMnO4 (denoted as H2O2-Fe(II) or KMnO4-Fe(II) process), for As(V) removal was compared with FeCl3 coagulation and the mechanisms were explored. The optimum oxidant/Fe(II) molar ratios for the H 2O2-Fe(II) and KMnO4-Fe(II) processes were 1:2 and 1:3, respectively. The advantage of Fe(III) formed in situ over pre-formed Fe(III) for As(V) removal was strongly dependent on the Fe/As ratio and the advantage became less significant at high Fe/As ratio. The hydrolysis of Fe(III) formed in situ generated much more Feb species than the pre-formed Fe(III) did. Moreover, Fe(III) formed in situ hydrolyzed more slowly and generated flocs with smaller size compared to the pre-formed Fe(III) did over the pH range of 6.0-8.0. An introduction of high shear force for 1 min in the flocculation stage to break the aggregates into small particles enhanced the uptake of As(V) by pre-formed Fe(III) to a larger extent than that by Fe(III) formed in situ. The good performance of Fe(III) formed in situ for As(V) removal should be ascribed primarily to slow floc aggregation rate and small floc size and secondly to the formation of large amount of polymeric hydrolysis species.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)198-204
Number of pages7
JournalSeparation and Purification Technology
Volume115
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Arsenate
  • Coagulation
  • Fe(III) formed in situ
  • Floc properties

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Removal of arsenate from water by coagulation with in situ formed versus pre-formed Fe(III)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this