Rational design and fabrication of graphene/carbon nanotubes hybrid sponge for high-performance capacitive deionization

  • Xingtao Xu
  • , Yong Liu
  • , Ting Lu
  • , Zhuo Sun
  • , Daniel H.C. Chua
  • , Likun Pan*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

100 Scopus citations

Abstract

Capacitive deionization (CDI) is an emerging technology offering a green and efficient route to obtain clean water. Up to now, the key of CDI technology has been focused on the exploration of electrode materials with a rationally designed structure and excellent performance, because the electrosorption performance of the carbon-based electrodes reported to date cannot meet the demands of practical applications of CDI. Herein, novel graphene/carbon nanotubes (CNTs) hybrid sponge (GNS) structures were designed and fabricated via directly freeze-drying graphene oxide/CNTs mixed solution followed by annealing in nitrogen atmosphere. The morphology, structure and electrochemical performance of GNS were characterized by scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, Raman spectroscopy, nitrogen adsorption-desorption, cyclic voltammetry and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. The results show that GNS with 20 wt% CNTs has a maximum specific surface area of 498.2 m2 g-1 and a highest specific capacitance of 203.48 F g-1 among all the samples. When used as CDI electrode, it exhibits an ultrahigh electrosorption capacity of 18.7 mg g-1, and, to our knowledge, this value is superior to those of other carbon electrodes reported recently. GNS should be a promising electrode material for high-performance CDI.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)13418-13425
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Materials Chemistry A
Volume3
Issue number25
DOIs
StatePublished - 7 Jul 2015

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Rational design and fabrication of graphene/carbon nanotubes hybrid sponge for high-performance capacitive deionization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this