Prevalence of immunoglobulin A deficiency in Chinese blood donors and evaluation of anaphylactic transfusion reaction risk

  • M. L. Feng
  • , Y. L. Zhao
  • , T. Shen
  • , H. Huang
  • , B. Yin
  • , R. Z. Liu
  • , K. C. Qian
  • , D. Z. Liu*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

35 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives/Aims: We investigated the incidence of immunoglobulin A (IgA) deficiency in Chinese population. Background: The frequency of IgA deficiency, defined as a serum IgA level of <0·05 mg dL -1, has been broadly studied in different ethnic groups. Individuals with IgA deficiency may form specific antibodies against IgA, which can cause an anaphylactic response when the patient receives an IgA-containing blood transfusion. Methods: A sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was performed to screen for IgA deficiency and particle gel immunoassay used for confirmation. IgA antibodies were further detected by the DiaMed anti-IgA test in IgA-deficient blood donors. Results: Of the total 22 609 healthy blood donors screened, only seven cases were confirmed as having IgA deficiency (<0·05 mg dL -1). Another seven cases displayed relative IgA deficiencies, with mean IgA concentrations ranging from 0·39 to 3·70 mg dL -1. Anti-IgA was identified in 2 of the 14 IgA-deficient blood donors whose IgA levels were <5 mg dL -1. Estimation of the theoretical risk for IgA anaphylactic transfusion reaction was 0·009%. Conclusion: The prevalence of IgA deficiency in Chinese is low. However, potential risks exist in performing blood transfusion to IgA-deficient persons, and measures should be taken to reduce IgA anaphylaxis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)338-343
Number of pages6
JournalTransfusion Medicine
Volume21
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2011

Keywords

  • Anti-IgA
  • IgA deficiency
  • Transfusion reaction

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prevalence of immunoglobulin A deficiency in Chinese blood donors and evaluation of anaphylactic transfusion reaction risk'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this