TY - JOUR
T1 - Policy mobilities, networks, and minjian as method for reimagining decoloniality
T2 - following the policy learning experiment with international curricula in Shanghai
AU - Jin, Jin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 British Association for International and Comparative Education.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Policy borrowing is a common practice in contemporary societies. China once used international curricula as sources of reference to inform local education innovation and respond to new globalisation demands. However, China’s recent policies saw a radical shift in the policy learning orientation and increasingly emphasised ‘Chinese characteristics’. This paper follows the policy initiative to learn from international curricula in Shanghai, based on a three-step study comprising document analysis, semi-structured interviews, and a network ethnography analysis. The findings highlight four approaches of policy mobilities and mutations, namely ‘policy weaving’, ‘policy segregating’, ‘policy fabricating’, and ‘policy dialoguing’. They demonstrate complex relations and intersections between West-centric and China-centric networks, subjectivities, discourses, and dominations. Echoing decoloniality studies, this paper foregrounds the need to recognise and challenge intersected structures of power and suggests the minjian perspective to (re)imagine the potential for global pluriversality.
AB - Policy borrowing is a common practice in contemporary societies. China once used international curricula as sources of reference to inform local education innovation and respond to new globalisation demands. However, China’s recent policies saw a radical shift in the policy learning orientation and increasingly emphasised ‘Chinese characteristics’. This paper follows the policy initiative to learn from international curricula in Shanghai, based on a three-step study comprising document analysis, semi-structured interviews, and a network ethnography analysis. The findings highlight four approaches of policy mobilities and mutations, namely ‘policy weaving’, ‘policy segregating’, ‘policy fabricating’, and ‘policy dialoguing’. They demonstrate complex relations and intersections between West-centric and China-centric networks, subjectivities, discourses, and dominations. Echoing decoloniality studies, this paper foregrounds the need to recognise and challenge intersected structures of power and suggests the minjian perspective to (re)imagine the potential for global pluriversality.
KW - China
KW - Policy mobilities
KW - decoloniality
KW - international curricula
KW - policy enactments
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85209998902
U2 - 10.1080/03057925.2024.2429830
DO - 10.1080/03057925.2024.2429830
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:85209998902
SN - 0305-7925
JO - Compare
JF - Compare
ER -