TY - JOUR
T1 - Panel data analysis on the influence of environmental regulations on the inflow of foreign direct investment in China
AU - Hu, Hao
AU - Dong, Lei
AU - Zhang, Hao
AU - Tang, Haiyan
AU - Yin, Desheng
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 WITPress. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/11/13
Y1 - 2020/11/13
N2 - From the micro level, this paper thoroughly investigates the influence of environmental regulations (ERS) on the inflow of foreign direct investment (FDI) in China. Firstly, the entropy method was adopted to comprehensively measure the ERS intensities of 283 Chinese cities at prefecture level and above in 2003-2016. Then, the Cournot model was utilized to analyze how ERS affects FDI. After that, fixed-effects model was employed to empirically examine the impacts of ERS intensities in eastern, central, and western regions on FDI inflow. The results show that: The regression results on nationwide, central, and western samples indicate that the influence of ERS variable was significantly negative. This means ERS is indeed an important consideration of foreign investors in location selection. Besides, stricter ERS hinders the inflow of FDI, which agrees with the pollution haven hypothesis. On eastern samples, stricter ERS promotes FDI inflow, that is, the situation in eastern region meets Porter hypothesis. Finally, several suggestions were presented for policymakers based on the empirical results.
AB - From the micro level, this paper thoroughly investigates the influence of environmental regulations (ERS) on the inflow of foreign direct investment (FDI) in China. Firstly, the entropy method was adopted to comprehensively measure the ERS intensities of 283 Chinese cities at prefecture level and above in 2003-2016. Then, the Cournot model was utilized to analyze how ERS affects FDI. After that, fixed-effects model was employed to empirically examine the impacts of ERS intensities in eastern, central, and western regions on FDI inflow. The results show that: The regression results on nationwide, central, and western samples indicate that the influence of ERS variable was significantly negative. This means ERS is indeed an important consideration of foreign investors in location selection. Besides, stricter ERS hinders the inflow of FDI, which agrees with the pollution haven hypothesis. On eastern samples, stricter ERS promotes FDI inflow, that is, the situation in eastern region meets Porter hypothesis. Finally, several suggestions were presented for policymakers based on the empirical results.
KW - Environmental regulations (ERS)
KW - Foreign direct investment (FDI)
KW - Pollution haven hypothesis
KW - Porter hypothesis
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85096913531
U2 - 10.18280/IJSDP.150708
DO - 10.18280/IJSDP.150708
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:85096913531
SN - 1743-7601
VL - 15
SP - 1035
EP - 1044
JO - International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning
JF - International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning
IS - 7
ER -