ONE PERSON, TWO OUTCOMES: WHY AND HOW MANAGER PROMOTIVE AND PREVENTIVE PSYCHOLOGICAL OWNERSHIP INFLUENCE VOICE ENDORSEMENT

Jinyun Duan; Xiaotian Wang; Yue Xu; Lixiaoyun Shi

doi:10.5465/AMBPP.2021.153

ONE PERSON, TWO OUTCOMES: WHY AND HOW MANAGER PROMOTIVE AND PREVENTIVE PSYCHOLOGICAL OWNERSHIP INFLUENCE VOICE ENDORSEMENT

Jinyun Duan
, Xiaotian Wang
, Yue Xu
, Lixiaoyun Shi

School of Psychology and Cognitive Science

Research output: Contribution to journal › Conference article › peer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Integrating the literature on psychological ownership (PO) and regulatory focus theory, this study explores why and how managers' promotive and preventive PO influence voice endorsement. Results from a time-lagged field study and an experimental scenario study reveals that managers' promotive PO is positively, while preventive PO is negatively related to voice endorsement through openness to change. Moreover, the group promotive voice strengthens the positive indirect effect of managers' promotive PO on voice endorsement via openness to change, whereas group prohibitive voice strengthens the negative indirect effect of preventive PO. Theoretical and practical implications of these results are also discussed.

Original language	English
Journal	Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2021.153
State	Published - 2021
Event	81st Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management 2021: Bringing the Manager Back in Management, AoM 2021 - Virtual, Online Duration: 29 Jul 2021 → 4 Aug 2021

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.5465/AMBPP.2021.153

Cite this

@article{1469e2b875574d0ab1d3776f08796408,

title = "ONE PERSON, TWO OUTCOMES: WHY AND HOW MANAGER PROMOTIVE AND PREVENTIVE PSYCHOLOGICAL OWNERSHIP INFLUENCE VOICE ENDORSEMENT",

abstract = "Integrating the literature on psychological ownership (PO) and regulatory focus theory, this study explores why and how managers' promotive and preventive PO influence voice endorsement. Results from a time-lagged field study and an experimental scenario study reveals that managers' promotive PO is positively, while preventive PO is negatively related to voice endorsement through openness to change. Moreover, the group promotive voice strengthens the positive indirect effect of managers' promotive PO on voice endorsement via openness to change, whereas group prohibitive voice strengthens the negative indirect effect of preventive PO. Theoretical and practical implications of these results are also discussed.",

author = "Jinyun Duan and Xiaotian Wang and Yue Xu and Lixiaoyun Shi",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} AoM 2021.All right reserved.; 81st Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management 2021: Bringing the Manager Back in Management, AoM 2021 ; Conference date: 29-07-2021 Through 04-08-2021",

year = "2021",

doi = "10.5465/AMBPP.2021.153",

language = "英语",

journal = "Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings",

issn = "0065-0668",

publisher = "Academy of Management",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - ONE PERSON, TWO OUTCOMES

T2 - 81st Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management 2021: Bringing the Manager Back in Management, AoM 2021

AU - Duan, Jinyun

AU - Wang, Xiaotian

AU - Xu, Yue

AU - Shi, Lixiaoyun

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - Integrating the literature on psychological ownership (PO) and regulatory focus theory, this study explores why and how managers' promotive and preventive PO influence voice endorsement. Results from a time-lagged field study and an experimental scenario study reveals that managers' promotive PO is positively, while preventive PO is negatively related to voice endorsement through openness to change. Moreover, the group promotive voice strengthens the positive indirect effect of managers' promotive PO on voice endorsement via openness to change, whereas group prohibitive voice strengthens the negative indirect effect of preventive PO. Theoretical and practical implications of these results are also discussed.

AB - Integrating the literature on psychological ownership (PO) and regulatory focus theory, this study explores why and how managers' promotive and preventive PO influence voice endorsement. Results from a time-lagged field study and an experimental scenario study reveals that managers' promotive PO is positively, while preventive PO is negatively related to voice endorsement through openness to change. Moreover, the group promotive voice strengthens the positive indirect effect of managers' promotive PO on voice endorsement via openness to change, whereas group prohibitive voice strengthens the negative indirect effect of preventive PO. Theoretical and practical implications of these results are also discussed.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85208753282

U2 - 10.5465/AMBPP.2021.153

DO - 10.5465/AMBPP.2021.153

M3 - 会议文章

AN - SCOPUS:85208753282

SN - 0065-0668

JO - Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings

JF - Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings

Y2 - 29 July 2021 through 4 August 2021

ER -

ONE PERSON, TWO OUTCOMES: WHY AND HOW MANAGER PROMOTIVE AND PREVENTIVE PSYCHOLOGICAL OWNERSHIP INFLUENCE VOICE ENDORSEMENT

Abstract

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this