No Compelling Evidence that Preferences for Facial Masculinity Track Changes in Women’s Hormonal Status

  • Benedict C. Jones*
  • , Amanda C. Hahn
  • , Claire I. Fisher
  • , Hongyi Wang
  • , Michal Kandrik
  • , Chengyang Han
  • , Vanessa Fasolt
  • , Danielle Morrison
  • , Anthony J. Lee
  • , Iris J. Holzleitner
  • , Kieran J. O’Shea
  • , S. Craig Roberts
  • , Anthony C. Little
  • , Lisa M. DeBruine
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

152 Scopus citations

Abstract

Although widely cited as strong evidence that sexual selection has shaped human facial-attractiveness judgments, findings suggesting that women’s preferences for masculine characteristics in men’s faces are related to women’s hormonal status are equivocal and controversial. Consequently, we conducted the largest-ever longitudinal study of the hormonal correlates of women’s preferences for facial masculinity (N = 584). Analyses showed no compelling evidence that preferences for facial masculinity were related to changes in women’s salivary steroid hormone levels. Furthermore, both within-subjects and between-subjects comparisons showed no evidence that oral contraceptive use decreased masculinity preferences. However, women generally preferred masculinized over feminized versions of men’s faces, particularly when assessing men’s attractiveness for short-term, rather than long-term, relationships. Our results do not support the hypothesized link between women’s preferences for facial masculinity and their hormonal status.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)996-1005
Number of pages10
JournalPsychological Science
Volume29
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jun 2018
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • attractiveness
  • mate preferences
  • menstrual cycle
  • open data
  • open materials
  • oral contraceptives
  • sexual selection

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'No Compelling Evidence that Preferences for Facial Masculinity Track Changes in Women’s Hormonal Status'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this