TY - JOUR
T1 - Network governance in education
T2 - the experiences and struggles of local governments in Chinese school turnaround
AU - Tao, Yuan
AU - Liu, Shiqing
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, © 2020 National Institute of Education, Singapore.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - While network governance in education has been widely discussed in the literature, research focusing on the behaviours of and interactions between pluralist actors is rare, and the power exercised by China’s local governments in network governance is under-researched. This study uses school turnaround, a networking process that involves multiple actors, as a research window to explore the complexity of local governments’ role in network governance. With empirical data from document analysis, observation, and interviews, this study found three patterns of local governments’ interactions with schools and third-party actors in school turnaround in Shanghai–acting as dominator, accommodator, or facilitator–in different networks. The analyses of the findings reveal that, different from symmetric and asymmetric power models of network governance, network governance in Chinese school turnaround is a differentiated practice involving local governments’ different extents of power exercise over other network actors and different degrees of unequal power relations among them (i.e., hierarchical, diffused, or democratic), resulting from the interplay of factors related to tripartite actors.
AB - While network governance in education has been widely discussed in the literature, research focusing on the behaviours of and interactions between pluralist actors is rare, and the power exercised by China’s local governments in network governance is under-researched. This study uses school turnaround, a networking process that involves multiple actors, as a research window to explore the complexity of local governments’ role in network governance. With empirical data from document analysis, observation, and interviews, this study found three patterns of local governments’ interactions with schools and third-party actors in school turnaround in Shanghai–acting as dominator, accommodator, or facilitator–in different networks. The analyses of the findings reveal that, different from symmetric and asymmetric power models of network governance, network governance in Chinese school turnaround is a differentiated practice involving local governments’ different extents of power exercise over other network actors and different degrees of unequal power relations among them (i.e., hierarchical, diffused, or democratic), resulting from the interplay of factors related to tripartite actors.
KW - Chinese education
KW - Network governance
KW - collaborative network
KW - local government
KW - school turnaround
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85088270035
U2 - 10.1080/02188791.2020.1792828
DO - 10.1080/02188791.2020.1792828
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:85088270035
SN - 0218-8791
SP - 1
EP - 15
JO - Asia Pacific Journal of Education
JF - Asia Pacific Journal of Education
ER -