TY - JOUR
T1 - Minimizing the t1-noise when using an indirect 1H high-resolution detection of unlabeled samples
AU - Shen, M.
AU - Wegner, S.
AU - Trébosc, J.
AU - Hu, B.
AU - Lafon, O.
AU - Amoureux, J. P.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2017/10
Y1 - 2017/10
N2 - The most utilized through-space correlation 1H-{X} methods with proton indirect detection use two consecutive transfers, 1H → X and then X → 1H, with the evolution time t1 in the middle. When the X isotope is not 100% naturally abundant (NA), only the signal of the protons close to these isotopes is modulated by the 1H-X dipolar interactions. This signal is theoretically disentangled with phase-cycling from the un-modulated one. However, this separation is never perfect and it may lead to t1-noise in case of isotopes with very small NA, such as 13C or even worse 15N. One way to reduce this t1-noise is to minimize, ‘purge’, during t1 the un-modulated 1H magnetization before trying to suppress it with phase-cycling. We analyze experimentally several sequences following the HORROR condition, which allow purging the 1H transverse magnetization. The comparison is made at three spinning speeds, including very fast ones for 1H resolution: 27.75, 55.5 and 111 kHz. We show (i) that the efficiency of this purging process increases with the spinning speed, and (ii) that the best recoupling sequences are the two simplest ones: XY and S1 = SR212. We then compare the S/N that can be achieved with the two most used 1H-{X} 2D methods, called D-HMQC and CP-CP. The only difference in between these two methods is that the transfers are done with either two π/2-pulses on X channel (D-HMQC), or two Cross-Polarization (CP) transfers (CP-CP). The first method, D-HMQC, is very robust and should be preferred when indirectly detecting nuclei with high NA. The second method, CP-CP, (i) requires experimental precautions to limit the t1-noise, and (ii) is difficult to use with quadrupolar nuclei because the two CP transfers are then not efficient nor robust. However, CP-CP is presently the best method to indirectly detect isotopes with small NA, such as 13C and 15N.
AB - The most utilized through-space correlation 1H-{X} methods with proton indirect detection use two consecutive transfers, 1H → X and then X → 1H, with the evolution time t1 in the middle. When the X isotope is not 100% naturally abundant (NA), only the signal of the protons close to these isotopes is modulated by the 1H-X dipolar interactions. This signal is theoretically disentangled with phase-cycling from the un-modulated one. However, this separation is never perfect and it may lead to t1-noise in case of isotopes with very small NA, such as 13C or even worse 15N. One way to reduce this t1-noise is to minimize, ‘purge’, during t1 the un-modulated 1H magnetization before trying to suppress it with phase-cycling. We analyze experimentally several sequences following the HORROR condition, which allow purging the 1H transverse magnetization. The comparison is made at three spinning speeds, including very fast ones for 1H resolution: 27.75, 55.5 and 111 kHz. We show (i) that the efficiency of this purging process increases with the spinning speed, and (ii) that the best recoupling sequences are the two simplest ones: XY and S1 = SR212. We then compare the S/N that can be achieved with the two most used 1H-{X} 2D methods, called D-HMQC and CP-CP. The only difference in between these two methods is that the transfers are done with either two π/2-pulses on X channel (D-HMQC), or two Cross-Polarization (CP) transfers (CP-CP). The first method, D-HMQC, is very robust and should be preferred when indirectly detecting nuclei with high NA. The second method, CP-CP, (i) requires experimental precautions to limit the t1-noise, and (ii) is difficult to use with quadrupolar nuclei because the two CP transfers are then not efficient nor robust. However, CP-CP is presently the best method to indirectly detect isotopes with small NA, such as 13C and 15N.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85021810464
U2 - 10.1016/j.ssnmr.2017.06.008
DO - 10.1016/j.ssnmr.2017.06.008
M3 - 文章
C2 - 28688541
AN - SCOPUS:85021810464
SN - 0926-2040
VL - 87
SP - 111
EP - 116
JO - Solid State Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
JF - Solid State Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
ER -