TY - JOUR
T1 - Microplastics and Soil Greenhouse Gas Emissions
T2 - A Critical Reflection on Meta-Analyses
AU - Zhang, Linjie
AU - Wang, Chenya
AU - Xie, Bing
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 American Chemical Society
PY - 2025/9/9
Y1 - 2025/9/9
N2 - Microplastics (MPs) are widespread in agricultural soils and may influence emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs), though their specific impacts remain uncertain. This study utilized conventional and network meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of long-term exposure to environmentally relevant MP concentrations. Results showed that, compared with uncontaminated soil, polypropylene increased CH4emissions by 2.01 times, while polyethylene terephthalate reduced them to 0.47 times. Polybutylene adipate terephthalate (PBAT) and polylactic acid/PBAT increased CO2emissions by 3.13 and 2.70 times, respectively; polyethylene raised N2O emissions by 1.52 times. Other MPs had no significant impact. Most types of MPs increased GHG emissions, with conventional MPs contributing more to N2O emissions and biodegradable MPs contributing more to CO2emissions. Biodegradable plastics were not necessarily more environmentally friendly in terms of global warming potential. Moreover, the study summarized issues in current meta-analyses targeting MPs, emphasizing the need to prioritize MP types, account for correlations and interactions among moderators, ensure effect size independence, and address potential “P-hacking” during the discretization of continuous variables. This deepens our comprehension of the environmental impacts of MPs and provides valuable guidance for future meta-analyses to accurately assess effects of MPs.
AB - Microplastics (MPs) are widespread in agricultural soils and may influence emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs), though their specific impacts remain uncertain. This study utilized conventional and network meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of long-term exposure to environmentally relevant MP concentrations. Results showed that, compared with uncontaminated soil, polypropylene increased CH4emissions by 2.01 times, while polyethylene terephthalate reduced them to 0.47 times. Polybutylene adipate terephthalate (PBAT) and polylactic acid/PBAT increased CO2emissions by 3.13 and 2.70 times, respectively; polyethylene raised N2O emissions by 1.52 times. Other MPs had no significant impact. Most types of MPs increased GHG emissions, with conventional MPs contributing more to N2O emissions and biodegradable MPs contributing more to CO2emissions. Biodegradable plastics were not necessarily more environmentally friendly in terms of global warming potential. Moreover, the study summarized issues in current meta-analyses targeting MPs, emphasizing the need to prioritize MP types, account for correlations and interactions among moderators, ensure effect size independence, and address potential “P-hacking” during the discretization of continuous variables. This deepens our comprehension of the environmental impacts of MPs and provides valuable guidance for future meta-analyses to accurately assess effects of MPs.
KW - agricultural soil
KW - global warming potential
KW - greenhouse gas
KW - meta-analysis
KW - microplastic
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105015534137
U2 - 10.1021/acs.est.5c08835
DO - 10.1021/acs.est.5c08835
M3 - 文章
C2 - 40845217
AN - SCOPUS:105015534137
SN - 0013-936X
VL - 59
SP - 18927
EP - 18935
JO - Environmental Science and Technology
JF - Environmental Science and Technology
IS - 35
ER -