Loss of top-down biotic interactions changes the relative benefits for obligate mutualists

  • Rong Wang
  • , Xiao Yong Chen
  • , Yan Chen
  • , Gang Wang
  • , Derek W. Dunn
  • , Rupert J. Quinnell
  • , Stephen G. Compton*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

24 Scopus citations

Abstract

The collapse of mutualisms owing to anthropogenic changes is contributing to losses of biodiversity. Top predators can regulate biotic interactions between species at lower trophic levels and may contribute to the stability of such mutualisms, but they are particularly likely to be lost after disturbance of communities. We focused on the mutualism between the fig tree Ficus microcarpa and its host-specific pollinator fig wasp and compared the benefits accrued by the mutualists in natural and translocated areas of distribution. Parasitoids of the pollinator were rare or absent outside the natural range of the mutualists, where the relative benefits the mutualists gained from their interaction were changed significantly away from the plant’s natural range owing to reduced seed production rather than increased numbers of pollinator offspring. Furthermore, in the absence of the negative effects of its parasitoids, we detected an oviposition range expansion by the pollinator, with the use of a wider range of ovules that could otherwise have generated seeds. Loss of top-down control has therefore resulted in a change in the balance of reciprocal benefits that underpins this obligate mutualism, emphasizing the value of maintaining food web complexity in the Anthropocene.

Original languageEnglish
Article number20182501
JournalProceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Volume286
Issue number1897
DOIs
StatePublished - 27 Feb 2019

Keywords

  • Fig-fig wasp mutualism
  • Interspecific interactions
  • Parasitoids
  • Trophic cascades

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Loss of top-down biotic interactions changes the relative benefits for obligate mutualists'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this