Logical Hylomorphism and Its Problems: Revisiting the Form-Content Distinction in Human Reasoning

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

According to a version of logical hylomorphism that is derived from Kant and has become popular along with the use of modern logic techniques, the validity of reasoning is a purely formal validity completely independent of content, and logic’s concern with such formality is the primary characteristic that distinguishes it from other disciplines. However, this conception of logical hylomorphism is wavering as contemporary non-classical logic, philosophy of logic and psychology of reasoning delve deeply into the problem of reasoning. Given the instability of the form-content distinction, the non-eliminability of material validity, and the robust “content effect” in actual human reasoning, it is reasonable to rethink the role of “formality” and “logical words” in the study of logic from a contemporary multidisciplinary perspective.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)190-206
Number of pages17
JournalFrontiers of Philosophy in China
Volume20
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2025

Keywords

  • form and content
  • human reasoning
  • logical hylomorphism
  • logical words

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Logical Hylomorphism and Its Problems: Revisiting the Form-Content Distinction in Human Reasoning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this