Knowledge and power: curricular policy’s evolution and paradoxical relationship with practice in Shanghai

Zhongjing Huang*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Curriculum, as an expression of legitimate knowledge, should be seen as something political rather than technical, that is, as the result of complex power relations and struggles among identifiable stakeholder groups. In Shanghai, curricular reform, which traditionally assumes the crucial task of cultivating responsible citizens, has sought to situate education as an instrument of ideological indoctrination, at least to some extent. However, due to economic and social changes, such as those related to globalisation and modern ideals of educational development, curricular reform has undergone remarkable ideological changes that have given rise to paradoxes between policy and practice. This article explores the evolution of curricular policy and the ways in which it emerges in a paradoxical relationship to practice by analysing the relationship between curricular knowledge and power in Shanghai.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-10
Number of pages10
JournalEducational Philosophy and Theory
DOIs
StatePublished - 2020

Keywords

  • Knowledge
  • Shanghai education
  • curriculum policy
  • paradox
  • power

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Knowledge and power: curricular policy’s evolution and paradoxical relationship with practice in Shanghai'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this