TY - JOUR
T1 - Is puhui kindergarten a panacea for the ‘3A’ problems of early childhood education in China? Evidence from a national validation study
AU - Zhou, Yu
AU - Jiang, Yong
AU - Zheng, Chuchu
AU - Li, Hui
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2020/12
Y1 - 2020/12
N2 - In 2010, China launched a national campaign to rapidly develop ‘puhui’ kindergartens (PhKs) as a panacea for the ‘3A’ problems (accessibility, accountability, and affordability) in early childhood education. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of this top-down strategy from the perspectives of the stakeholders (i.e., parents, ECE teachers, and principals) using a newly developed and validated instrument, the Puhui Kindergarten Rating Scale (PKRS). Altogether, 28,732 parents, 4709 teachers, and 1365 principals from PhKs nationwide were randomly surveyed. First, the psychometric properties indicated that PKRS was a reliable and valid scale with five constructs: Allocation, Accessibility, Assorting, Administration, and All-inclusive. Second, descriptive statistics demonstrated that PhKs were rated relatively higher in Assorting and Administration but lower in Allocation and All-inclusive. This result indicated that the quality of PhKs was satisfactory even though there were equity problems. The implications for policymaking and practical improvement have also been addressed.
AB - In 2010, China launched a national campaign to rapidly develop ‘puhui’ kindergartens (PhKs) as a panacea for the ‘3A’ problems (accessibility, accountability, and affordability) in early childhood education. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of this top-down strategy from the perspectives of the stakeholders (i.e., parents, ECE teachers, and principals) using a newly developed and validated instrument, the Puhui Kindergarten Rating Scale (PKRS). Altogether, 28,732 parents, 4709 teachers, and 1365 principals from PhKs nationwide were randomly surveyed. First, the psychometric properties indicated that PKRS was a reliable and valid scale with five constructs: Allocation, Accessibility, Assorting, Administration, and All-inclusive. Second, descriptive statistics demonstrated that PhKs were rated relatively higher in Assorting and Administration but lower in Allocation and All-inclusive. This result indicated that the quality of PhKs was satisfactory even though there were equity problems. The implications for policymaking and practical improvement have also been addressed.
KW - China
KW - Development and validation
KW - Early childhood education
KW - Evaluation
KW - Puhui kindergarten
KW - Rating scale
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85096644029
U2 - 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105702
DO - 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105702
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:85096644029
SN - 0190-7409
VL - 119
JO - Children and Youth Services Review
JF - Children and Youth Services Review
M1 - 105702
ER -