Is L2 Learners’ Metaphorical Competence Essentially Cognitive, Linguistic, or Personal?—A Meta-Analysis

Metaphorical competence—the capacity to comprehend and produce metaphors in a second language (L2)—is essential for nuanced, accurate, and contextually appropriate English usage. Synthesizing 40 independent studies (N = 15,786), this meta-analysis quantified the relative contributions of cognitive, linguistic, and personal factors to L2 metaphorical competence. Effect sizes were derived from correlation coefficients and aggregated under random-effects models to account for between-study heterogeneity. Linguistic factors emerged as the dominant predictor (r = 0.421, 95% CI [0.34, 0.50]), primarily driven by vocabulary breadth/depth and reading proficiency. Cognitive factors exerted a moderate influence (r = 0.232, 95% CI [0.17, 0.30]), whereas personal variables such as gender yielded only a small effect (r = 0.216, 95% CI [0.15, 0.28]). Moderator analyses further revealed that L1 conceptual knowledge constitutes the strongest single predictor of L2 metaphor skills and highlighted distinct associations between receptive and productive metaphor abilities with linguistic versus cognitive aptitudes. The findings collectively point to lexico-semantic and literacy development as the main levers for boosting L2 metaphorical competence, with cognitive aptitudes and personal factors acting as secondary, yet important, modulators. Insight from this meta-analysis offers a robust foundation for evidence-based decisions in curriculum design, materials selection, and targeted pedagogical interventions.