TY - JOUR
T1 - Insights into the contrasting effects of sulfidation on dechlorination of chlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbons by zero-valent iron
AU - Sun, Yuankui
AU - Zheng, Kaiwei
AU - Du, Xueying
AU - Qin, Hejie
AU - Guan, Xiaohong
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024
PY - 2024/5/15
Y1 - 2024/5/15
N2 - Contrasting effects of sulfidation on contaminants reduction by zero-valent iron (ZVI) has been reported in literature but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Here, under well-controlled conditions, we compared the performance of ZVI and sulfidated ZVI (S-ZVI) toward a series of chlorinated compounds. Results revealed that, although S-ZVI was more reactive than ZVI toward hexachloroethane, pentachloroethane, tetrachloroethylene, and trichloroethene, sulfidation hindered the dechlorination of the other ten tested chlorinated aliphatics by a factor of 1.5–125. Moreover, S-ZVI may lead to an accumulation of toxic partially-dechlorinated products. Analogous to its effects on ZVI reactivity, sulfidation also exerted positive, negligible, or negative effects on the electron efficiency of ZVI. Solvent kinetic isotope effect analysis suggested that direct electron transfer rather than reaction with atomic hydrogen was the dominant reduction mechanism in S-ZVI system. Hence, the sulfidation enhancing effects could be expected only when direct electron transfer is the preferred reduction route for target contaminants. Furthermore, linear free energy relationships analysis indicated one-electron reduction potential could be used to predict the transformation of chlorinated ethanes by S-ZVI, whereas for chlorinated ethenes, their adsorption properties on S-ZVI determined the dechlorination process. All these findings may offer guidance for the decision-making regarding the application of S-ZVI.
AB - Contrasting effects of sulfidation on contaminants reduction by zero-valent iron (ZVI) has been reported in literature but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Here, under well-controlled conditions, we compared the performance of ZVI and sulfidated ZVI (S-ZVI) toward a series of chlorinated compounds. Results revealed that, although S-ZVI was more reactive than ZVI toward hexachloroethane, pentachloroethane, tetrachloroethylene, and trichloroethene, sulfidation hindered the dechlorination of the other ten tested chlorinated aliphatics by a factor of 1.5–125. Moreover, S-ZVI may lead to an accumulation of toxic partially-dechlorinated products. Analogous to its effects on ZVI reactivity, sulfidation also exerted positive, negligible, or negative effects on the electron efficiency of ZVI. Solvent kinetic isotope effect analysis suggested that direct electron transfer rather than reaction with atomic hydrogen was the dominant reduction mechanism in S-ZVI system. Hence, the sulfidation enhancing effects could be expected only when direct electron transfer is the preferred reduction route for target contaminants. Furthermore, linear free energy relationships analysis indicated one-electron reduction potential could be used to predict the transformation of chlorinated ethanes by S-ZVI, whereas for chlorinated ethenes, their adsorption properties on S-ZVI determined the dechlorination process. All these findings may offer guidance for the decision-making regarding the application of S-ZVI.
KW - Atomic hydrogen
KW - Electron transfer
KW - Linear free energy relationships
KW - Selectivity
KW - Solvent kinetic isotope effect
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85188947955
U2 - 10.1016/j.watres.2024.121494
DO - 10.1016/j.watres.2024.121494
M3 - 文章
C2 - 38552485
AN - SCOPUS:85188947955
SN - 0043-1354
VL - 255
JO - Water Research
JF - Water Research
M1 - 121494
ER -