TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of pH control and heat pre-treatment of seed inoculum in dark H2 fermentation
T2 - A feasibility report using mixed microalgae biomass as feedstock
AU - Kumar, Gopalakrishnan
AU - Zhen, Guangyin
AU - Kobayashi, Takuro
AU - Sivagurunathan, Periyasamy
AU - Kim, Sang Hyoun
AU - Xu, Kai Qin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC.
PY - 2016/2/23
Y1 - 2016/2/23
N2 - This study investigated the effect of controlling pH (5.5) and heat pre-treatment of seed inoculum in dark fermentative hydrogen production. The results showed that only inoculum source plays an important role rather than pH and heat treatment. Seed source is vital factor despite, heat treatment and pH controlled at 5.5. Mesophilic fermentation resulted in CH4 generation, however, thermophilic fermentation while using thermophilic inoculum is opted for H2 generation. In contrast promoted mesophilic inoculum (mesophilic to thermophilic) still documented for CH4 generation. Peak hydrogen production rate (HPR) and methane production rate (MPR) were noted as 90 and 117 mL/L-d, during the conditions of thermo inoculum (thermophilic, pH 5.5) and pH no control (mesophilic) experiments, respectively. Peak, total solids (TS) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal were achieved as 56 and 42% at mesophilic condition. Volatile fatty acid (VFA) profiling revealed the background of the process performances. Microbial community analysis via fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) narrated that bacteria and archaea communities were enriched during thermophilic and mesophilic experiments, respectively. Besides, the presence of methanogens revealed that heat treatment and controlling moderately acidic pH (5.5) could not completely eliminate them and resulted in CH4 generation, rather than H2 production.
AB - This study investigated the effect of controlling pH (5.5) and heat pre-treatment of seed inoculum in dark fermentative hydrogen production. The results showed that only inoculum source plays an important role rather than pH and heat treatment. Seed source is vital factor despite, heat treatment and pH controlled at 5.5. Mesophilic fermentation resulted in CH4 generation, however, thermophilic fermentation while using thermophilic inoculum is opted for H2 generation. In contrast promoted mesophilic inoculum (mesophilic to thermophilic) still documented for CH4 generation. Peak hydrogen production rate (HPR) and methane production rate (MPR) were noted as 90 and 117 mL/L-d, during the conditions of thermo inoculum (thermophilic, pH 5.5) and pH no control (mesophilic) experiments, respectively. Peak, total solids (TS) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal were achieved as 56 and 42% at mesophilic condition. Volatile fatty acid (VFA) profiling revealed the background of the process performances. Microbial community analysis via fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) narrated that bacteria and archaea communities were enriched during thermophilic and mesophilic experiments, respectively. Besides, the presence of methanogens revealed that heat treatment and controlling moderately acidic pH (5.5) could not completely eliminate them and resulted in CH4 generation, rather than H2 production.
KW - Heat pre-treatment
KW - Hydrogen
KW - Methane
KW - Mixed microalgae consortia
KW - Seed source
KW - pH control
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84961059846
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.08.069
DO - 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.08.069
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:84961059846
SN - 0360-3199
VL - 41
SP - 4382
EP - 4392
JO - International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
JF - International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
IS - 7
ER -