TY - JOUR
T1 - Hydrogen production promotion and energy saving in anaerobic co-fermentation of heat-treated sludge and food waste
AU - Zhang, Yuchen
AU - Ni, Ji Qin
AU - Liu, Changqing
AU - Ke, Yihong
AU - Zheng, Yuyi
AU - Zhen, Guangyin
AU - Xie, Sihuang
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2024.
PY - 2024/2
Y1 - 2024/2
N2 - The objective of this paper is to gain insights into the synergistic advantage of anaerobic co-fermentation of heat-treated sludge (HS) with food waste (FW) and heat-treated food waste (HFW) for hydrogen production. The results showed that, compared with raw sludge (RS) mixed with FW (RS-FW), the co-substrate of HS mixed with either FW (HS-FW) or HFW (HS-HFW) effectively promoted hydrogen production, with HS-HFW promoted more than HS-FW. The maximum specific hydrogen production (MSHP) and the maximum hydrogen concentration (MHC) of HS-HFW were 40.53 mL H2/g dry weight and 57.22%, respectively, and 1.21- and 1.45-fold as high as those from HS-FW. The corresponding fermentation was ethanol type for HS-HFW and butyric acid type for HS-FW. The net energy production from RS-FW and HS-FW was both negative, but it was positive (2.57 MJ) from 40% HFW addition to HS-HFW. Anaerobic fermentation was more viable for HS-HFW.
AB - The objective of this paper is to gain insights into the synergistic advantage of anaerobic co-fermentation of heat-treated sludge (HS) with food waste (FW) and heat-treated food waste (HFW) for hydrogen production. The results showed that, compared with raw sludge (RS) mixed with FW (RS-FW), the co-substrate of HS mixed with either FW (HS-FW) or HFW (HS-HFW) effectively promoted hydrogen production, with HS-HFW promoted more than HS-FW. The maximum specific hydrogen production (MSHP) and the maximum hydrogen concentration (MHC) of HS-HFW were 40.53 mL H2/g dry weight and 57.22%, respectively, and 1.21- and 1.45-fold as high as those from HS-FW. The corresponding fermentation was ethanol type for HS-HFW and butyric acid type for HS-FW. The net energy production from RS-FW and HS-FW was both negative, but it was positive (2.57 MJ) from 40% HFW addition to HS-HFW. Anaerobic fermentation was more viable for HS-HFW.
KW - Anaerobic fermentation
KW - Energy balance
KW - Heat-treated substrate
KW - Hydrogen fermentation
KW - Renewable energy
KW - Substrate transformation
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85185843154
U2 - 10.1007/s11356-024-31851-y
DO - 10.1007/s11356-024-31851-y
M3 - 文章
C2 - 38285252
AN - SCOPUS:85185843154
SN - 0944-1344
VL - 31
SP - 14831
EP - 14844
JO - Environmental Science and Pollution Research
JF - Environmental Science and Pollution Research
IS - 10
ER -
