He and Hubbell reply

Fangliang He; Stephen P. Hubbell

doi:10.1038/nature10859

He and Hubbell reply

Fangliang He^*
, Stephen P. Hubbell

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Short survey › peer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

Replying to H. M. Pereira, L. Borda-de-Água & I. Santos Martins 482, 10.1038/nature10857; C. D. Thomas & M. Williamson 482, 10.1038/nature10858Pereira et al. argue that our conclusion that species-area relationships (SARs) always overestimate extinction is not general because the spatial configuration of landscape destruction can influence the results. Thomas and Williamson argue that there are many other causes of extinction besides habitat loss. We agree with the latter comment, but show that the arguments of Pereira et al. are not substantiated.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	E5-E6
Journal	Nature
Volume	482
Issue number	7386
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10859
State	Published - 23 Feb 2012
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

10.1038/nature10859

Cite this

@article{73527dd6bd02415b9d345f6bbcc3dcfb,

title = "He and Hubbell reply",

abstract = "Replying to H. M. Pereira, L. Borda-de-{\'A}gua \& I. Santos Martins 482, 10.1038/nature10857; C. D. Thomas \& M. Williamson 482, 10.1038/nature10858Pereira et al. argue that our conclusion that species-area relationships (SARs) always overestimate extinction is not general because the spatial configuration of landscape destruction can influence the results. Thomas and Williamson argue that there are many other causes of extinction besides habitat loss. We agree with the latter comment, but show that the arguments of Pereira et al. are not substantiated.",

author = "Fangliang He and Hubbell, \{Stephen P.\}",

year = "2012",

month = feb,

day = "23",

doi = "10.1038/nature10859",

language = "英语",

volume = "482",

pages = "E5--E6",

journal = "Nature",

issn = "0028-0836",

publisher = "Nature Research",

number = "7386",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - He and Hubbell reply

AU - He, Fangliang

AU - Hubbell, Stephen P.

PY - 2012/2/23

Y1 - 2012/2/23

N2 - Replying to H. M. Pereira, L. Borda-de-Água & I. Santos Martins 482, 10.1038/nature10857; C. D. Thomas & M. Williamson 482, 10.1038/nature10858Pereira et al. argue that our conclusion that species-area relationships (SARs) always overestimate extinction is not general because the spatial configuration of landscape destruction can influence the results. Thomas and Williamson argue that there are many other causes of extinction besides habitat loss. We agree with the latter comment, but show that the arguments of Pereira et al. are not substantiated.

AB - Replying to H. M. Pereira, L. Borda-de-Água & I. Santos Martins 482, 10.1038/nature10857; C. D. Thomas & M. Williamson 482, 10.1038/nature10858Pereira et al. argue that our conclusion that species-area relationships (SARs) always overestimate extinction is not general because the spatial configuration of landscape destruction can influence the results. Thomas and Williamson argue that there are many other causes of extinction besides habitat loss. We agree with the latter comment, but show that the arguments of Pereira et al. are not substantiated.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84857381766

U2 - 10.1038/nature10859

DO - 10.1038/nature10859

M3 - 短篇评述

AN - SCOPUS:84857381766

SN - 0028-0836

VL - 482

SP - E5-E6

JO - Nature

JF - Nature

IS - 7386

ER -

He and Hubbell reply

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this