Geographical statistical assessments of carbon fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems of China: Results from upscaling network observations

  • Xian Jin Zhu
  • , Gui Rui Yu*
  • , Hong Lin He
  • , Qiu Feng Wang
  • , Zhi Chen
  • , Yan Ni Gao
  • , Yi Ping Zhang
  • , Jun Hui Zhang
  • , Jun Hua Yan
  • , Hui Min Wang
  • , Guang Sheng Zhou
  • , Bing Rui Jia
  • , Wen Hua Xiang
  • , Ying Nian Li
  • , Liang Zhao
  • , Yan Fen Wang
  • , Pei Li Shi
  • , Shi Ping Chen
  • , Xiao Ping Xin
  • , Feng Hua Zhao
  • Yu Ying Wang, Cheng Li Tong, Yu Ling Fu, Xue Fa Wen, Ying Chun Liu, Lei Ming Zhang, Li Zhang, Wen Su, Sheng Gong Li, Xiao Min Sun
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

55 Scopus citations

Abstract

Accurate quantifying the magnitudes and distributions of carbon budgets is helpful for strategies in mitigating global climate change. Based on spatial patterns of carbon fluxes (gross ecosystem productivity (GEP), ecosystem respiration (ER) and net ecosystem productivity (NEP)) and their drivers, we constructed geographical statistical assessment schemes and quantified the magnitudes of carbon fluxes in China. The optimal assessment scheme was then validated with observed eddy covariance data to analyze the spatial distributions of carbon fluxes. Using climate-based geographical statistical assessment schemes, our estimates of GEP, ER and NEP in China during 2000s were 7.51±0.51, 5.82±0.16 and 1.91±0.15PgCyr-1, corresponding to 4.29%-6.80%, 5.65%-6.06% and 9.10%-12.73% of global annual carbon fluxes, respectively. The spatial distributions of GEP, ER and NEP, generated from the optimal scheme, were similar, following a southeast-northwest decreasing gradient. The maximum values for GEP, ER and NEP were 1790, 1300 and 490gCm-2yr-1, respectively, which occurred in Central subtropics and Southern subtropics. Climate-based geographical statistical assessment schemes provided an independent dataset for the regional carbon budget assessment, which can be deemed as the potential carbon fluxes. Meanwhile, most areas in China were potential carbon sink especially Eastern China and the largest potential carbon sink appeared in Central subtropics and Southern subtropics.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)52-61
Number of pages10
JournalGlobal and Planetary Change
Volume118
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2014
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Carbon budget assessment
  • Ecosystem respiration
  • Eddy covariance
  • Gross ecosystem productivity
  • Net ecosystem productivity
  • Potential carbon sink

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Geographical statistical assessments of carbon fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems of China: Results from upscaling network observations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this