TY - JOUR
T1 - Geographic variation in the robustness of pollination networks is mediated by modularity
AU - Liu, Hanlun
AU - Liu, Zheyi
AU - Zhang, Minhua
AU - Bascompte, Jordi
AU - He, Fangliang
AU - Chu, Chengjin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
PY - 2021/7
Y1 - 2021/7
N2 - Aim: Extinctions and coextinctions seriously threaten global plant–pollinator assemblies, and thus a better understanding of the geographic variability in their robustness is urgently required. Although the geographic patterns of species extinction rates are frequently explored, it remains largely unknown how the subsequent coextinction risk of species varies across environments. We hypothesize that the geographic variation of network robustness to extinctions is mediated by modularity – the tendency of a network to be organized in modules of strongly interacting species – because modularity buffers perturbations and varies across environments. Location: Global. Time period: Current. Major taxa studied: Flowering plants and their animal pollinators. Methods: Using 79 pollination networks, we first explored the variation of network robustness across geographic and climatic gradients and, second, analysed the role of modularity in explaining the association between robustness and those environmental gradients. We quantified the robustness of taxonomic, functional and phylogenetic diversity of pollinators under simulated coextinctions triggered by specialist-first, generalist-first, and random plant removals. Results: Only the robustness of phylogenetic diversity under specialist-first removals showed a global latitudinal trend by which robustness increased towards the tropics on mainlands but increased towards the poles on islands. Generally, robustness was strongly promoted by modularity, and also directly dampened by insularity and precipitation seasonality (PS). Through the mediation of modularity, robustness was indirectly increased by actual evapotranspiration and PS, and decreased by the interaction between PS and insularity. Besides, network size and sampling area affected robustness but did not influence modularity. Main conclusions: The indirect environmental effect on robustness via modularity was prevalent, which supports our hypothesis and reveals the importance of network structure in mediating the geographic variation of network robustness. The global pattern of robustness indicates the phylogenetic diversity of pollinators is relatively vulnerable to the loss of specialist plants in tropical islands and high-latitude mainland compared to other regions.
AB - Aim: Extinctions and coextinctions seriously threaten global plant–pollinator assemblies, and thus a better understanding of the geographic variability in their robustness is urgently required. Although the geographic patterns of species extinction rates are frequently explored, it remains largely unknown how the subsequent coextinction risk of species varies across environments. We hypothesize that the geographic variation of network robustness to extinctions is mediated by modularity – the tendency of a network to be organized in modules of strongly interacting species – because modularity buffers perturbations and varies across environments. Location: Global. Time period: Current. Major taxa studied: Flowering plants and their animal pollinators. Methods: Using 79 pollination networks, we first explored the variation of network robustness across geographic and climatic gradients and, second, analysed the role of modularity in explaining the association between robustness and those environmental gradients. We quantified the robustness of taxonomic, functional and phylogenetic diversity of pollinators under simulated coextinctions triggered by specialist-first, generalist-first, and random plant removals. Results: Only the robustness of phylogenetic diversity under specialist-first removals showed a global latitudinal trend by which robustness increased towards the tropics on mainlands but increased towards the poles on islands. Generally, robustness was strongly promoted by modularity, and also directly dampened by insularity and precipitation seasonality (PS). Through the mediation of modularity, robustness was indirectly increased by actual evapotranspiration and PS, and decreased by the interaction between PS and insularity. Besides, network size and sampling area affected robustness but did not influence modularity. Main conclusions: The indirect environmental effect on robustness via modularity was prevalent, which supports our hypothesis and reveals the importance of network structure in mediating the geographic variation of network robustness. The global pattern of robustness indicates the phylogenetic diversity of pollinators is relatively vulnerable to the loss of specialist plants in tropical islands and high-latitude mainland compared to other regions.
KW - ecological networks
KW - functional groups
KW - island
KW - latitudinal gradients
KW - macroecology
KW - phylogenetic diversity
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85104936215
U2 - 10.1111/geb.13310
DO - 10.1111/geb.13310
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:85104936215
SN - 1466-822X
VL - 30
SP - 1447
EP - 1460
JO - Global Ecology and Biogeography
JF - Global Ecology and Biogeography
IS - 7
ER -